Paravastu Sharath Chandra Vikram, Mendonca Derick A, Da Silva Anthony
Academic Vascular Unit, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK, S1 4DA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):CD005508. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005508.pub3.
Beta (β) blockers are indicated for use in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, optimal therapy for people with CAD accompanied by intermittent claudication has been controversial because of the presumed peripheral haemodynamic consequences of beta blockers, leading to worsening symptoms of intermittent claudication. This is an update of a review first published in 2008.
To quantify the potential harmful effects of beta blockers on maximum walking distance, claudication distance, calf blood flow, calf vascular resistance and skin temperature when used in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD).
For this update, the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched March 2013) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, 2013, Issue 2).
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of both selective (β1) and non-selective (β1 and β2) beta blockers compared with placebo. We excluded trials that compared different types of beta blockers.
Primary outcome measures were claudication distance in metres, time to claudication in minutes and maximum walking distance in metres and minutes (as assessed by treadmill).Secondary outcome measures included calf blood flow (mL/100 mL/min), calf vascular resistance and skin temperature (ºC).
We included six RCTs that fulfilled the above criteria, with a total of 119 participants. The beta blockers studied were atenolol, propranolol, pindolol and metoprolol. All trials were of poor quality with the drugs administered over a short time (10 days to two months). None of the primary outcomes were reported by more than one study. Similarly, secondary outcome measures, with the exception of vascular resistance (as reported by three studies), were reported, each by only one study. Pooling of such results was deemed inappropriate. None of the trials showed a statistically significant worsening effect of beta blockers on time to claudication, claudication distance and maximal walking distance as measured on a treadmill, nor on calf blood flow, calf vascular resistance and skin temperature, when compared with placebo. No reports described adverse events associated with the beta blockers studied.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Currently, no evidence suggests that beta blockers adversely affect walking distance, calf blood flow, calf vascular resistance and skin temperature in people with intermittent claudication. However, because of the lack of large published trials, beta blockers should be used with caution, if clinically indicated.
β受体阻滞剂被用于冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的治疗。然而,对于伴有间歇性跛行的CAD患者,最佳治疗方案一直存在争议,因为β受体阻滞剂可能会对周围血流动力学产生影响,从而导致间歇性跛行症状加重。这是对2008年首次发表的一篇综述的更新。
量化β受体阻滞剂用于外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者时,对最大行走距离、跛行距离、小腿血流量、小腿血管阻力和皮肤温度的潜在有害影响。
对于本次更新,Cochrane外周血管疾病组试验检索协调员检索了专业注册库(最后检索时间为2013年3月)和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL,Cochrane图书馆,2013年第2期)。
评估选择性(β1)和非选择性(β1和β2)β受体阻滞剂与安慰剂相比作用的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们排除了比较不同类型β受体阻滞剂的试验。
主要结局指标为以米为单位的跛行距离、以分钟为单位的出现跛行的时间以及以米和分钟为单位的最大行走距离(通过跑步机评估)。次要结局指标包括小腿血流量(mL/100 mL/min)、小腿血管阻力和皮肤温度(℃)。
我们纳入了6项符合上述标准的RCT,共有119名参与者。所研究的β受体阻滞剂有阿替洛尔、普萘洛尔、吲哚洛尔和美托洛尔。所有试验质量都很差,药物给药时间较短(10天至2个月)。不止一项研究报告的主要结局指标一个都没有。同样,除血管阻力(三项研究报告了该指标)外,次要结局指标每项也仅由一项研究报告。认为汇总这些结果不合适。与安慰剂相比,没有一项试验显示β受体阻滞剂对跑步机测量的出现跛行的时间、跛行距离和最大行走距离,以及对小腿血流量、小腿血管阻力和皮肤温度有统计学上显著的不良影响。没有报告描述与所研究的β受体阻滞剂相关的不良事件。
目前,没有证据表明β受体阻滞剂会对间歇性跛行患者的行走距离、小腿血流量、小腿血管阻力和皮肤温度产生不利影响。然而,由于缺乏大量已发表的试验,如果有临床指征,应谨慎使用β受体阻滞剂。