• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《烟草控制框架公约》和自愿行业健康警语标签对 1965 年至 2012 年强制性香烟警语标签通过的影响:转移概率和事件历史分析。

Effect of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and voluntary industry health warning labels on passage of mandated cigarette warning labels from 1965 to 2012: transition probability and event history analyses.

机构信息

Ashley N. Sanders-Jackson and Stanton A. Glantz are with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco. Anna V. Song is with University of California Merced, Psychological Sciences, Merced. Heikki Hiilamo is with Social Insurance Institution of Finland, Helsinki.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2013 Nov;103(11):2041-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301324. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301324
PMID:24028248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3795937/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We quantified the pattern and passage rate of cigarette package health warning labels (HWLs), including the effect of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and HWLs voluntarily implemented by tobacco companies.

METHODS

We used transition probability matrices to describe the pattern of HWL passage and change rate in 4 periods. We used event history analysis to estimate the effect of the FCTC on adoption and to compare that effect between countries with voluntary and mandatory HWLs.

RESULTS

The number of HWLs passed during each period accelerated, from a transition rate among countries that changed from 2.42 per year in 1965-1977 to 6.71 in 1977-1984, 8.42 in 1984-2003, and 22.33 in 2003-2012. The FCTC significantly accelerated passage of FCTC-compliant HWLs for countries with initially mandatory policies with a hazard of 1.27 per year (95% confidence interval = 1.11, 1.45), but only marginally increased the hazard for countries that had an industry voluntary HWL of 1.68 per year (95% confidence interval = 0.95, 2.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Passage of HWLs is accelerating, and the FCTC is associated with further acceleration. Industry voluntary HWLs slowed mandated HWLs.

摘要

目的

我们量化了香烟包装健康警示标签(HWLs)的出现和更替模式,包括《烟草控制框架公约》(FCTC)和烟草公司自愿实施的 HWLs 的影响。

方法

我们使用转移概率矩阵来描述 4 个时期 HWL 更替的模式和更替率。我们使用事件历史分析来估计 FCTC 对采用的影响,并比较具有自愿和强制 HWLs 的国家之间的这种影响。

结果

每个时期 HWL 的数量都在加速增加,从 1965-1977 年的每年 2.42 个国家间的更替率,到 1977-1984 年的 6.71、1984-2003 年的 8.42 和 2003-2012 年的 22.33。FCTC 显著加速了最初采用强制性政策的国家中符合 FCTC 的 HWL 的更替,其危险比为每年 1.27(95%置信区间=1.11,1.45),但对已经有行业自愿 HWL 的国家的危险比仅略有增加,为每年 1.68(95%置信区间=0.95,2.97)。

结论

HWL 的更替正在加速,FCTC 与之相关,进一步加速了更替。行业自愿 HWLs 减缓了强制性 HWLs 的更替。

相似文献

1
Effect of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and voluntary industry health warning labels on passage of mandated cigarette warning labels from 1965 to 2012: transition probability and event history analyses.《烟草控制框架公约》和自愿行业健康警语标签对 1965 年至 2012 年强制性香烟警语标签通过的影响:转移概率和事件历史分析。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Nov;103(11):2041-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301324. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
2
Implementation of effective cigarette health warning labels among low and middle income countries: state capacity, path-dependency and tobacco industry activity.在中低收入国家实施有效的香烟健康警示标签:国家能力、路径依赖和烟草业活动。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;124:241-5. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.054. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
3
Tobacco Packaging and Labeling Policies in the WHO African Region: Progress 15 Years After Adoption of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 11 Implementation Guidelines.世卫组织非洲区域的烟草包装和标签政策:《世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约》第 11 条实施准则通过 15 年后的进展。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Sep 23;26(10):1347-1354. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae080.
4
The evolution of health warning labels on cigarette packs: the role of precedents, and tobacco industry strategies to block diffusion.香烟包装上健康警示标签的演变:先例的作用,以及烟草业阻止其扩散的策略。
Tob Control. 2014 Jan;23(1):e2. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050541. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
5
The impact of the 2009/2010 enhancement of cigarette health warning labels in Uruguay: longitudinal findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Uruguay Survey.2009/2010年乌拉圭加强香烟健康警示标签的影响:国际烟草控制(ITC)乌拉圭调查的纵向研究结果
Tob Control. 2016 Jan;25(1):89-95. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051742. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
6
Global Implementation of Tobacco Demand Reduction Measures Specified in Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.《框架公约》中规定的减少烟草需求措施的全球实施情况。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Mar 1;24(4):503-510. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab216.
7
Tobacco industry argues domestic trademark laws and international treaties preclude cigarette health warning labels, despite consistent legal advice that the argument is invalid.烟草业声称国内商标法和国际条约禁止使用香烟健康警告标签,尽管有一致的法律意见认为该论点无效。
Tob Control. 2014 May;23(3):e7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050569. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
8
Assumption of Risk and the Role of Health Warnings Labels in the United States.风险自负原则与美国健康警示标签的作用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 May 26;22(6):975-983. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz089.
9
Do cigarette health warning labels comply with requirements: A 14-country study.香烟健康警示标签是否符合要求:一项14国研究。
Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
10
Analysing compliance of cigarette packaging with the FCTC and national legislation in eight former Soviet countries.分析八个前苏联国家的香烟包装遵守《烟草控制框架公约》和国家立法的情况。
Tob Control. 2013 Jul;22(4):231-4. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050567. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Perfect Storm: Applying the Multiple Streams Framework to Understand the Adoption of a WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control-Based Policy in Mexico.完美风暴:运用多重流框架理解墨西哥采用世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约政策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 13;21(7):917. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070917.
2
Adopting a WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control-Based Tobacco Control Law in Ethiopia: Sustained Transnational Health Advocacy and Multi-Sectoral Institutionalized Support.在埃塞俄比亚采用基于世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约的烟草控制法:持续的跨国卫生宣传和多部门制度化支持。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 28;21(3):280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030280.
3
How do current tobacco warnings compare to the WHO FCTC guidelines: a content analysis of combustible tobacco warnings worldwide.当前的烟草警示语与世卫组织《烟草控制框架公约》准则相比如何:对全球可燃烟草警示语的内容分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 20;13(3):e062033. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062033.
4
Framework Convention on Tobacco Control 2030-A Program to Accelerate the Implementation of World Health Organization Framework Convention for Tobacco Control in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.《2030 年烟草控制框架公约》:加速中低收入国家实施世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约的方案:一项混合方法评估。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 May 22;25(6):1074-1081. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad022.
5
Global Implementation of Tobacco Demand Reduction Measures Specified in Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.《框架公约》中规定的减少烟草需求措施的全球实施情况。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Mar 1;24(4):503-510. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab216.
6
Memoranda of understanding: a tobacco industry strategy to undermine illicit tobacco trade policies.谅解备忘录:烟草业破坏非法烟草贸易政策的策略。
Tob Control. 2019 Dec;28(e2):e110-e118. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054668. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
7
Limited implementation of the framework convention on tobacco control's tobacco tax provision: global comparison.《框架公约》烟草税规定执行情况有限:全球比较。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 2;8(10):e021340. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021340.
8
Role of stakeholders in Nigeria's tobacco control journey after the FCTC: lessons for tobacco control advocacy in low-income and middle-income countries.利益相关者在尼日利亚《烟草控制框架公约》后的烟草控制之旅中的作用:对低收入和中等收入国家烟草控制宣传的启示。
Tob Control. 2019 Jul;28(4):386-393. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054344. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
9
Prevalence of Smoking among Men in Ethiopia and Kenya: A Cross-Sectional Study.埃塞俄比亚和肯尼亚男性吸烟率:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;15(6):1232. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061232.
10
Marijuana Regulatory Frameworks in Four US States: An Analysis Against a Public Health Standard.美国四个州的大麻监管框架:基于公共卫生标准的分析。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Jul;108(7):914-923. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304401.

本文引用的文献

1
The evolution of health warning labels on cigarette packs: the role of precedents, and tobacco industry strategies to block diffusion.香烟包装上健康警示标签的演变:先例的作用,以及烟草业阻止其扩散的策略。
Tob Control. 2014 Jan;23(1):e2. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050541. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
2
Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content.烟盒上的图形警示标签能否解决与吸烟有关的健康不平等问题?在墨西哥进行的评估图形警示标签内容的现场实验。
Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):69-80. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-9899-8. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
3
Tobacco industry success in Costa Rica: the importance of FCTC article 5.3.烟草业在哥斯达黎加的成功:《烟草控制框架公约》第 5.3 条的重要性。
Salud Publica Mex. 2012 Jan-Feb;54(1):28-38.
4
Implementation of the framework convention on tobacco control in Africa: current status of legislation.《框架公约》在非洲的实施:立法现状。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Nov;8(11):4312-31. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8114312. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
5
The nature, scope, and development of the global tobacco control epistemic community.全球烟草控制知识共同体的性质、范围和发展。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Nov;101(11):2044-54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300303. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
6
Front-of-package nutrition labeling--an abuse of trust by the food industry?包装正面营养标签——食品行业对信任的滥用?
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 23;364(25):2373-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1101033.
7
Regulating food retail for obesity prevention: how far can cities go?为预防肥胖而规范食品零售:城市能走多远?
J Law Med Ethics. 2011 Mar;39 Suppl 1:89-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00575.x.
8
Power of the process: evaluating the impact of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control negotiations.进程的力量:评估《烟草控制框架公约》谈判的影响。
Health Policy. 2011 May;100(2-3):107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.014. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
9
Global tobacco control diffusion: the case of the framework convention on tobacco control.全球烟草控制传播:以《烟草控制框架公约》为例。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Jul;100(7):1260-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.167833. Epub 2010 May 13.
10
The food industry and self-regulation: standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures.食品行业与自我监管:促进成功、避免公共卫生失败的标准。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):240-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160960. Epub 2009 Dec 17.