School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Ozmen Institute for Global Studies, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 28;21(3):280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030280.
The objective of this study was to document how Ethiopia adopted a WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC)-based tobacco control law.
We analyzed publicly available documents, including news media articles, advocacy reports, and government documents. We triangulated these findings by interviewing nine key stakeholders. Data were analyzed to construct a historical and thematic narrative and analyzed through a retrospective policy analysis.
Local and international health advocacy efforts helped introduce and support WHO FCTC-based legislation by (1) educating policymakers about the WHO FCTC, (2) providing legal assistance in drafting legislation, (3) generating local data to counter industry claims, and (4) producing media advocacy to expose industry activity. Health advocates worked closely with government officials to create a multi-sectoral tobacco committee to institutionalize efforts and insulate tobacco companies from the policymaking process. Japan Tobacco International bought majority shares of the government-owned tobacco company and attempted to participate in the process, using standard industry tactics to undermine legislative efforts. However, with health advocacy assistance, government officials were able to reject these attempts and adopt a WHO FCTC-based law in 2019 that included 100% smoke-free indoor places, a comprehensive ban on tobacco advertising, and large pictorial health warning labels, among other provisions.
Sustained local health advocacy efforts supported by international technical and financial assistance can help establish WHO FCTC-based tobacco control laws. Applying a standardized multi-sectoral approach can establish coordinating mechanisms to further institutionalize the WHO FCTC as a legal tool to build support with other government sectors and insulate the tobacco industry from the policymaking process.
本研究旨在记录埃塞俄比亚如何采用世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》(FCTC)为基础的控烟法律。
我们分析了公开文件,包括新闻媒体文章、宣传报告和政府文件。通过对 9 名关键利益攸关方进行访谈,对这些发现进行了三角验证。数据通过构建历史和主题叙述进行分析,并通过回顾性政策分析进行分析。
地方和国际卫生宣传努力通过以下方式帮助引入和支持基于世卫组织《烟草控制框架公约》的立法:(1)向决策者宣传世卫组织《烟草控制框架公约》;(2)在立法起草方面提供法律援助;(3)生成本地数据以反驳行业主张;(4)开展媒体宣传揭露行业活动。卫生倡导者与政府官员密切合作,创建了一个多部门的烟草委员会,以制度化努力并使烟草公司远离决策过程。日本烟草国际公司购买了政府拥有的烟草公司的多数股权,并试图参与该过程,使用标准的行业策略来破坏立法努力。然而,在卫生宣传的帮助下,政府官员能够拒绝这些企图,并在 2019 年通过了一项基于世卫组织《烟草控制框架公约》的法律,其中包括 100%的无烟室内场所、全面禁止烟草广告和大尺寸的图形健康警示标签等规定。
在国际技术和财政援助的支持下,持续的地方卫生宣传努力可以帮助建立基于世卫组织《烟草控制框架公约》的控烟法律。应用标准化的多部门方法可以建立协调机制,进一步将世卫组织《烟草控制框架公约》体制化为一个法律工具,以获得其他政府部门的支持,并使烟草业远离决策过程。