• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助神经康复在亚急性期和慢性期脑卒中中的应用:自发性恢复对结局的影响是否有限?

Robot-aided neurorehabilitation in sub-acute and chronic stroke: does spontaneous recovery have a limited impact on outcome?

机构信息

"Salvatore Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Service of Bioengineering, Pavia, Italy "Salvatore Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Service of Bioengineering, Veruno (NO), Italy.

"Salvatore Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Service of Bioengineering, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(4):621-9. doi: 10.3233/NRE-131002.

DOI:10.3233/NRE-131002
PMID:24029005
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic neurorehabilitation, thanks to high dosage/intensity training protocols, has the potential for a greater impact on impairment.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyze how time since the acute event may influence the motor recovery process during robot-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb.

METHODS

A total of 41 patients after stroke were enrolled: 20 in subacute phase, i.e. ≤ 6 months elapsed since their unilateral cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and 21 at chronic stage, i.e. > 6 months since CVA. All subjects underwent 30 minutes of robot-aided rehabilitation twice a day, 5 days a week for at least three weeks of training. Patients were evaluated at the start and end of treatment using the Fugl-Meyer and Modified Ashworth clinical scales and by a set of robot measured kinematic parameters. The time interval from stroke was considered as a grouping factor to analyze its impact on time course of recovery.

RESULTS

After training both groups significantly improved their impairment (F = 44.25, p < 0.001) but sub-acute patients showed a greater improvement on the Fugl-Meyer scale than chronic patients. The time course of recovery of the kinematic variables showed higher time constants of motor improvement in the sub-acute than chronic group, but they were one order lower than spontaneous recovery time constants.

CONCLUSIONS

Spontaneous recovery seems to have a limited impact on the improvement of sub-acute patients, most of their changes being likely due to re-learning during rehabilitation. In addition, a longer recovery time was required to maximize outcome in sub-acute than in chronic patients.

摘要

背景

由于采用了高剂量/高强度训练方案,机器人神经康复技术有可能对功能障碍产生更大的影响。

目的

我们旨在分析急性事件发生后时间的长短对上肢机器人辅助康复过程中的运动恢复的影响。

方法

共纳入 41 例脑卒中患者:20 例处于亚急性期(即单侧脑血管意外发生后≤6 个月),21 例处于慢性期(即脑血管意外发生后>6 个月)。所有患者均接受 30 分钟的机器人辅助康复治疗,每天两次,每周 5 天,至少训练 3 周。在治疗开始和结束时,使用 Fugl-Meyer 和改良 Ashworth 临床量表以及一系列机器人测量的运动学参数对患者进行评估。将卒中发生后的时间间隔作为分组因素,分析其对恢复过程的时间进程的影响。

结果

训练后,两组患者的功能障碍均显著改善(F = 44.25,p < 0.001),但亚急性期患者的 Fugl-Meyer 量表评分改善程度大于慢性期患者。运动学变量的恢复时间过程显示,亚急性期患者的运动改善时间常数高于慢性期患者,但比自发恢复时间常数低一个数量级。

结论

自发恢复似乎对亚急性期患者的改善影响有限,他们的大部分变化可能是由于康复过程中的再学习。此外,亚急性期患者需要更长的恢复时间才能使治疗效果最大化。

相似文献

1
Robot-aided neurorehabilitation in sub-acute and chronic stroke: does spontaneous recovery have a limited impact on outcome?机器人辅助神经康复在亚急性期和慢性期脑卒中中的应用:自发性恢复对结局的影响是否有限?
NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(4):621-9. doi: 10.3233/NRE-131002.
2
Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke.机器人辅助双侧力诱导等速手臂训练联合传统康复对慢性脑卒中患者手臂运动功能的影响
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Oct;88(10):1332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.016.
3
Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.不同机器人设备用于上肢康复的运动训练效果比较:一项回顾性研究
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Apr;53(2):240-248. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04297-0. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
4
Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.机器人技术与康复:慢性脑卒中上肢治疗与评估的新工具。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;47(2):223-36. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
5
Kinematic measures for upper limb motor assessment during robot-mediated training in patients with severe sub-acute stroke.严重亚急性中风患者在机器人辅助训练期间上肢运动评估的运动学测量方法。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016;34(2):237-45. doi: 10.3233/RNN-150565.
6
Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.急性卒中后上肢的机器人辅助康复
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Feb;88(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.032.
7
Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke.机器人辅助运动训练与传统治疗技术对脑卒中后上肢运动功能康复的比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jul;83(7):952-9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.33101.
8
Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke.中风后两种机器人辅助上肢运动训练技术的比较。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Sep;83(9):720-8. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000137313.14480.ce.
9
Taking a lesson from patients' recovery strategies to optimize training during robot-aided rehabilitation.从患者的康复策略中吸取教训,以优化机器人辅助康复训练。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 May;20(3):276-85. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2195679.
10
Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation.随机对照试验研究早期住院脑卒中康复治疗中上肢使用机器人辅助设备的效果。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 May;28(4):377-86. doi: 10.1177/1545968313513073. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain network characteristics between subacute and chronic stroke survivors in active, imagery, passive movement task: a pilot study.亚急性和慢性卒中幸存者在主动、想象、被动运动任务中的脑网络特征:一项初步研究。
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 19;14:1143955. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1143955. eCollection 2023.
2
Effect of Using TheraBracelet on Grasping versus Reaching in Poststroke Rehabilitation.TheraBracelet 在脑卒中康复中对抓握与伸手的影响。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2023 Oct;43(4):702-709. doi: 10.1177/15394492231151887. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
3
The Efficacity of the NeuroAssist Robotic System for Motor Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb-Promising Results from a Pilot Study.
神经辅助机器人系统在上肢运动康复中的疗效——一项初步研究的有前景结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 4;12(2):425. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020425.
4
Quantifying Quality of Reaching Movements Longitudinally Post-Stroke: A Systematic Review.脑卒中后纵向定量评估上肢伸展运动质量:系统综述。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Mar;36(3):183-207. doi: 10.1177/15459683211062890. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic therapy for upper and lower limb function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.经颅直流电刺激联合机器人治疗脑卒中后上下肢功能:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Sep 26;18(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00941-0.
6
Smoothness metric during reach-to-grasp after stroke: part 2. longitudinal association with motor impairment.脑卒中后抓握过程中的平滑度度量:第 2 部分。与运动障碍的纵向关联。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Sep 24;18(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00937-w.
7
Experimental Protocol to Assess Neuromuscular Plasticity Induced by an Exoskeleton Training Session.评估外骨骼训练课程诱导的神经肌肉可塑性的实验方案。
Methods Protoc. 2021 Jul 13;4(3):48. doi: 10.3390/mps4030048.
8
A randomized controlled trial on the effects induced by robot-assisted and usual-care rehabilitation on upper limb muscle synergies in post-stroke subjects.一项关于机器人辅助康复和常规康复对脑卒中后患者上肢肌肉协同作用影响的随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 5;11(1):5323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84536-8.
9
Factors influencing the use of health services by trauma patients according to insurance type and injury severity score in South Korea: Based on Andersen's behavioral model.根据安德森行为模型分析韩国创伤患者根据保险类型和损伤严重程度评分使用卫生服务的影响因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0238258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238258. eCollection 2020.
10
DUALarm: An open-source and 3D-printable device for upper limb neurorehabilitation.双警报器:一种用于上肢神经康复的开源且可3D打印的设备。
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2018 Jan 9;5:2055668317749989. doi: 10.1177/2055668317749989. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.