Centro de Biotecnología Genómica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Blvd. del Maestro esquina Elías Piña S/N, Colonia Narciso Mendoza, 88710, Cd. Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico,
Parasitol Res. 2013 Nov;112(11):3925-31. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3583-0. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
The posttreatment entomological surveillance (ES) of onchocerciasis in Latin America requires quite large numbers of flies to be examined for parasite infection to prove that the control strategies have worked and that the infection is on the path of elimination. Here, we report a high-throughput automated DNA isolation of Onchocerca volvulus for PCR using a major Latin American black fly vector of onchocerciasis. The sensitivity and relative effectiveness of silica-coated paramagnetic beads was evaluated in comparison with phenol chloroform (PC) method which is known as the gold standard of DNA extraction for ES in Latin America. The automated method was optimized in the laboratory and validated in the field to detect parasite DNA in Simulium ochraceum sensu lato flies in comparison with PC. The optimization of the automated method showed that it is sensitive to detect O. volvulus with a pool size of 100 flies as compared with PC which utilizes 50 flies pool size. The validation of the automated method in comparison with PC in an endemic community showed that 5/67 and 3/134 heads pools were positive for the two methods, respectively. There was no statistical variation (P < 0.05) in the estimation of transmission indices generated by automated method when compared with PC method. The fact that the automated method is sensitive to pool size up to 100 confers advantage over PC method and can, therefore, be employed in large-scale ES of onchocerciasis transmission in endemic areas of Latin America.
拉丁美洲旋毛虫病的治疗后昆虫学监测 (ES) 需要检查大量的苍蝇以确定寄生虫感染,以证明控制策略已发挥作用,并且感染正在消除。在这里,我们报告了一种用于 PCR 的奥氏旋毛虫高通量自动化 DNA 分离方法,该方法使用拉丁美洲奥氏旋毛虫的主要黑蝇载体。我们评估了硅胶涂层顺磁珠的灵敏度和相对有效性,并将其与酚氯仿 (PC) 方法进行比较,后者是拉丁美洲 ES 中 DNA 提取的金标准。该自动化方法在实验室中进行了优化,并在现场进行了验证,以检测 Simulium ochraceum sensu lato 苍蝇中的寄生虫 DNA,与 PC 进行比较。与 PC 相比,自动化方法的优化表明,它对检测 O.volvulus 的敏感性很高,其池大小为 100 只苍蝇,而 PC 的池大小为 50 只苍蝇。在流行社区中与 PC 相比,自动化方法的验证表明,两种方法的 5/67 和 3/134 个头池均为阳性。与 PC 方法相比,自动化方法产生的传播指数估计没有统计学差异 (P < 0.05)。自动化方法对池大小的敏感性高达 100 的事实优于 PC 方法,因此可用于拉丁美洲流行地区奥氏旋毛虫病传播的大规模 ES。