Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais , Belo Horizonte, MG , Brasil.
Braz J Microbiol. 2010 Apr;41(2):310-5. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822010000200008. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon species isolated from different sources employing the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method and E-test method. Thirty-four isolates of Trichosporon spp. and six CBS reference samples were tested for their susceptibility to Amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Voriconazole and Terbinafine. All species showed high Minimun Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) for Itraconazole and susceptibility to Fluconazole, The comparison among the results obtained by the CLSI method and E-test revealed larger discrepancies among 5-flucytosine and Itraconazole. The present work provides epidemiological data that could influence therapeutic choices. Furthermore, the comparison between different methodologies could help to analyze results obtained by different laboratories.
本研究旨在评估采用临床和实验室标准研究所(CLSI)方法和 E 试验方法从不同来源分离的 Trichosporon 种的抗真菌药敏谱。对 34 株 Trichosporon spp. 和 6 株 CBS 参考菌株进行了两性霉素 B、5-氟胞嘧啶、氟康唑、伊曲康唑、伏立康唑和特比萘芬的药敏试验。所有种均对伊曲康唑表现出高最小抑菌浓度(MIC)和对氟康唑的敏感性,CLSI 方法和 E 试验结果之间的比较显示 5-氟胞嘧啶和伊曲康唑之间存在更大的差异。本研究提供了可能影响治疗选择的流行病学数据。此外,不同方法之间的比较有助于分析不同实验室获得的结果。