Ferguson J E, Vick D J, Hogge J S, Hogge W A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville 22908.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;163(3):926-31. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91098-w.
We evaluated the reliability, culture findings, and fetal outcome after transcervical chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis in a group of 860 patients. All procedures were performed for the indication of advanced maternal age with consistent procedure and laboratory techniques. Successful procedures were completed in 97.7% (420/430) of patients in the chorionic villus sampling group, compared with 99.5% (428/430) in the amniocentesis group (p less than 0.01). Success was more frequent with only one attempt in the amniocentesis group (427/428) versus 354 of 420 in the chorionic villus sampling group (p less than 0.001). Culture failure was more common after chorionic villus sampling (p less than 0.001). Pregnancy loss rates through 28 weeks' gestation and the entire gestation were not significantly different. The prevalence of preterm delivery did not vary between groups, but birth weights of infants in the chorionic villus sampling group were significantly greater. In summary, the present investigation supports previous findings that chorionic villus sampling is a safe alternative to amniocentesis and is not associated with long-term pregnancy complications.
我们评估了860例患者经宫颈绒毛取样或羊膜穿刺术后的可靠性、培养结果及胎儿结局。所有操作均因产妇年龄偏大这一指征进行,操作过程及实验室技术均保持一致。绒毛取样组97.7%(420/430)的患者操作成功,而羊膜穿刺组这一比例为99.5%(428/430)(p<0.01)。羊膜穿刺组单次尝试成功率更高(427/428),而绒毛取样组420例中仅354例成功(p<0.001)。绒毛取样后培养失败更常见(p<0.001)。妊娠至28周及整个妊娠期的流产率无显著差异。早产发生率在两组间无差异,但绒毛取样组婴儿出生体重显著更高。总之,本研究支持既往研究结果,即绒毛取样是羊膜穿刺的一种安全替代方法,且与长期妊娠并发症无关。