外来物种风险评估的最佳实践：对 Leung 等人（2012）的评论。

Best practice in alien species risk assessment: a comment on Leung et al. (2012).

机构信息

Division of Mathematics, Informatics and Statistics, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, GPO Box 664, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; Biosecurity Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Ecosystem Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Ecol Lett. 2013 Nov;16(11):1414, e5. doi: 10.1111/ele.12163. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1111/ele.12163

PMID:24034474

Abstract

The TEASI model is presented in Leung et al. (2012; TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices. Ecol. Lett., 15, 1475) as a framework for best practice in alien species risk assessment. This is not supported by the paper's review as it does not define good, bad or best practice and therefore cannot logically make this claim.

摘要

TEASI 模型由 Leung 等人（2012 年）提出；即 TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices（分解外来物种风险评估：最佳实践框架）。这一说法在论文的综述中并未得到支持，因为该综述并未定义何为良好、不良或最佳实践，因此无法从逻辑上做出这样的断言。