Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;217(5):843-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
Public reporting of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey is designed to produce data on patients' perceptions of the quality of hospital care. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of complications on patient responses to Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems "top-box" (most favorable) scores.
All patients who underwent a colorectal procedure from October 2009 to June 2012 at a single center were included. Patient complications were categorized as major, minor, or no complications and "surgical technique" or "medical." Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare binary and ordinal top-box scores, respectively.
One thousand four hundred and nine surveys were collected for 1,233 patients (mean age 53 ± 15.7 years; 701 [52.2%] females) who underwent 955 (67.8%) major abdominal, 114 (8.1%) anorectal, and 340 (24.1%) stoma-related operations. There were 195 (13.8%) major and 396 (28.1%) minor complications. There were 159 (11.3%) technique complications and 411 (29.2%) medical complications. Patients without any complications were more likely to recommend the hospital than those with complications (p = 0.023) irrespective of type of complication (minor vs major; p = 0.72 or technique vs medical; p = 0.5). Responsiveness of hospital staff was also reported as higher for patients without complications (p = 0.0003) and the type of complication did not influence this assessment (minor vs major; p = 0.71 and technique vs medical; p = 0.95).
The occurrence of any complication after colorectal surgery adversely impacts patients' self-reported perceptions of hospital care as measured by Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems. An instrument that more accurately reflects patients' assessment of quality in the context of variations in patient, disease, and surgical factors is required.
医疗保健提供者和系统调查的医院消费者评估报告旨在提供患者对医院护理质量的看法的数据。本研究的目的是评估并发症对患者对医院消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统“顶盒”(最有利)评分的反应的影响。
所有于 2009 年 10 月至 2012 年 6 月在单一中心接受结直肠手术的患者均被纳入研究。患者并发症分为主要、次要或无并发症以及“手术技术”或“医疗”。使用卡方检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验分别比较二项式和有序顶盒评分。
共收集了 1409 份调查,涉及 1233 名患者(平均年龄 53 ± 15.7 岁;701 [52.2%] 名女性),其中 955 名(67.8%)进行了主要腹部手术,114 名(8.1%)肛门直肠手术,340 名(24.1%)造口术相关手术。有 195 名(13.8%)主要并发症和 396 名(28.1%)次要并发症。有 159 名(11.3%)技术并发症和 411 名(29.2%)医疗并发症。无任何并发症的患者比有并发症的患者更有可能推荐医院(p = 0.023),无论并发症类型(次要 vs 主要;p = 0.72 或技术 vs 医疗;p = 0.5)。无并发症的患者报告医院工作人员的反应性也更高(p = 0.0003),并发症类型并不影响这种评估(次要 vs 主要;p = 0.71 和技术 vs 医疗;p = 0.95)。
结直肠手术后任何并发症的发生都会对患者对医院护理的自我报告感知产生不利影响,这是通过医疗保健提供者和系统调查的医院消费者评估来衡量的。需要一种仪器来更准确地反映患者在患者、疾病和手术因素变化情况下对质量的评估。