• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液系统癌症初诊时医生的沟通方式

Physician communication styles in initial consultations for hematological cancer.

作者信息

Chhabra Karan R, Pollak Kathryn I, Lee Stephanie J, Back Anthony L, Goldman Roberta E, Tulsky James A

机构信息

Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):573-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.023. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.023
PMID:24035463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3852201/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize practices in subspecialist physicians' communication styles, and their potential effects on shared decision-making, in second-opinion consultations.

METHODS

Theme-oriented discourse analysis of 20 second-opinion consultations with subspecialist hematologist-oncologists.

RESULTS

Physicians frequently "broadcasted" information about the disease, treatment options, relevant research, and prognostic information in extended, often-uninterrupted monologs. Their communicative styles had one of two implications: conveying options without offering specific recommendations, or recommending one without incorporating patients' goals and values into the decision. Some physicians, however, used techniques that encouraged patient participation.

CONCLUSIONS

Broadcasting may be a suboptimal method of conveying complex treatment information in order to support shared decision-making. Interventions could teach techniques that encourage patient participation.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Techniques such as open-ended questions, affirmations of patients' expressions, and pauses to check for patient understanding can mitigate the effects of broadcasting and could be used to promote shared decision-making in information-dense subspecialist consultations.

摘要

目的

描述专科医生在二次诊断咨询中的沟通方式及其对共同决策的潜在影响。

方法

对20例血液肿瘤专科医生的二次诊断咨询进行主题导向话语分析。

结果

医生经常在冗长且往往不间断的独白中“播报”有关疾病、治疗方案、相关研究和预后信息。他们的沟通方式有两种影响之一:传达选项但不提供具体建议,或者推荐一种方案但未将患者的目标和价值观纳入决策。然而,一些医生使用了鼓励患者参与的技巧。

结论

为支持共同决策,“播报”可能是传达复杂治疗信息的次优方法。干预措施可以教授鼓励患者参与的技巧。

实践意义

诸如开放式问题、肯定患者表达以及停顿以检查患者理解情况等技巧,可以减轻“播报”的影响,并可用于在信息密集的专科咨询中促进共同决策。

相似文献

1
Physician communication styles in initial consultations for hematological cancer.血液系统癌症初诊时医生的沟通方式
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):573-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.023. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
2
Information Needs Expressed During Patient-Oriented Oncology Consultations: Quantity, Variation, and Barriers.以患者为导向的肿瘤学咨询中表达的信息需求:数量、差异和障碍。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):488-497. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1329-5.
3
The clinical context and patient participation in post-diagnostic consultations.临床背景与患者在诊断后咨询中的参与情况。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.004. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
4
When do cancer patients regret their treatment decision? A path analysis of the influence of clinicians' communication styles and the match of decision-making styles on decision regret.癌症患者何时会后悔他们的治疗决定?一项关于临床医生沟通方式及决策风格匹配对决策后悔影响的路径分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):739-46. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.019. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
5
The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients.屏幕对屏幕咨询与面对面咨询对医患沟通的影响:一项针对模拟患者的实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 20;19(12):e421. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8033.
6
Patient participation in decision-making about cardiovascular preventive drugs - resistance as agency.患者参与心血管预防药物决策——作为能动性的阻力
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017 Sep;35(3):231-239. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1288814. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
"I need to know what makes somebody tick …": Challenges and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Individualized Oncology.“我需要知道是什么在驱动着……”:个体化肿瘤学中实施共享决策的挑战与策略。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):555-562. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0615. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
8
Using decision support tools for treatment decision making about antidepressants in outpatient psychiatric consultations.在门诊精神科咨询中使用决策支持工具来辅助抗抑郁药物治疗决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Jul;124:108266. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108266. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
9
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
10
Is patient behavior during consultation associated with shared decision-making? A study of patients' questions, cues and concerns in relation to observed shared decision-making in a cancer outpatient clinic.患者在咨询过程中的行为是否与共同决策相关?一项关于患者在癌症门诊中观察到的共同决策时提出的问题、线索和关注点的研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Mar;101(3):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
More than "hematology": a qualitative study on the experience of hematologists treating people with blood cancer in Greece.不止于“血液学”:希腊血液科医生治疗血癌患者经历的质性研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 20;33(4):307. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09320-0.
2
Communication Strategies of Transplant Hematologists in High-Risk Decision-Making Conversations.移植血液学家在高风险决策对话中的沟通策略。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Apr;20(4):538-548. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00574. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.将患者价值观和偏好纳入医疗保健中:定性证据的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 18;12(11):e067268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067268.
4
Treatment decision making (TDM): a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of patients with chronic haematological cancers.治疗决策制定(TDM):一项探索慢性血液系统癌症患者观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 29;12(3):e050816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050816.
5
Behavioral Patterns in Breaking Bad News Communication: An Ethnographic Study with Hematologists.《在坏消息沟通中行为模式:一项对血液学家的民族志研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;19(5):2585. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052585.
6
Incurable but treatable: Understanding, uncertainty and impact in chronic blood cancers-A qualitative study from the UK's Haematological Malignancy Research Network.无法治愈但可治疗:从英国血液恶性肿瘤研究网络的定性研究了解慢性血液癌症中的不确定性和影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 10;17(2):e0263672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263672. eCollection 2022.
7
A general model of conversational dynamics and an example application in serious illness communication.会话动态的一般模型及其在重病沟通中的应用示例。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253124. eCollection 2021.
8
Development and preliminary evaluation of a communication skills training programme for hospital physicians by a specialized palliative care service: the 'Teach to Talk' programme.由专门的姑息治疗服务机构为医院医生开发并初步评估的沟通技巧培训计划:“教授谈话”计划。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 15;20(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02275-2.
9
Developing a digital training tool to support oncologists in the skill of information-provision: a user centred approach.开发数字培训工具以支持肿瘤学家提供信息的技能:以用户为中心的方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 1;20(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1985-0.
10
Defining the patient experience in medical oncology.定义医学肿瘤学中的患者体验。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Apr;28(4):1649-1658. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04972-1. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Authoritarian physicians and patients' fear of being labeled 'difficult' among key obstacles to shared decision making.权威型医生和患者担心被贴上“难对付”的标签,这是阻碍共同决策的关键因素。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):1030-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0576.
2
Participation and conflict in the decision-making process for endoscopic resection or surgical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.参与和决策过程中的冲突内镜下切除或手术胃切除术治疗早期胃癌。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jul 1;106(1):101-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.23049. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
3
The doctor and the patient--how is a clinical encounter perceived?医生与患者——临床相遇是如何被感知的?
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
4
How surgeons design treatment recommendations in orthopaedic surgery.外科医生如何设计矫形外科的治疗建议。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(7):1028-36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.061. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
5
Coping styles, health status and advance care planning in patients with hematologic malignancies.血液病患者的应对方式、健康状况和预先医疗照护计划。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2011 Dec;52(12):2342-8. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2011.601474. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
6
How pressure is applied in shared decisions about antipsychotic medication: a conversation analytic study of psychiatric outpatient consultations.抗精神病药物治疗共享决策中压力如何施加:精神科门诊咨询的会话分析研究。
Sociol Health Illn. 2012 Jan;34(1):95-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01363.x. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
7
Information giving and receiving in hematological malignancy consultations.血液恶性肿瘤咨询中的信息提供和接收。
Psychooncology. 2012 Mar;21(3):297-306. doi: 10.1002/pon.1891. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
8
The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once.逐一讨论辅助治疗的益处,而不是一次性全部讨论。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Aug;129(1):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1193-4. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
9
Patients' reflections on communication in the second-opinion hematology-oncology consultation.患者对血液肿瘤二诊咨询中沟通的反馈。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jul;76(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.016. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
10
'It's something for you both to think about': choice and decision making in nuchal translucency screening for Down's syndrome.“这是你们俩都需要考虑的事情”:唐氏综合征颈项透明层筛查中的选择与决策
Sociol Health Illn. 2008 May;30(4):511-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01071.x. Epub 2008 Feb 20.