• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非特异性下腰痛患者群体的教育/运动干预的结果:3 年回顾。

Outcomes of a group education/exercise intervention in a population of patients with non-specific low back pain: a 3-year review.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland,

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2014 Sep;183(3):341-50. doi: 10.1007/s11845-013-1013-z. Epub 2013 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-013-1013-z
PMID:24037101
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) can prove resistant to treatment. Conservative management in form of education and exercise is advocated as a first-line treatment option. The format of exercise programmes varies, as does the scale of improvement. Individual and group models of care are commonly utilised.

AIMS

To determine the effectiveness of a group education/exercise intervention in a cohort of patients with LBP in a teaching hospital in the south east of Ireland. In addition, the study explores which factors are predictive of a positive outcome.

METHODS

Patients aged 18-65 years with LBP > 6 months, who completed the programme between January 2008 and December 2010 were included. Outcome measures were coded, entered into PASW 18 and cleaned. Pre and post scores were analysed with paired t tests and χ (2) analysis. Multiple regression modelling was used to determine which baseline variables were independent predictors of positive outcome.

RESULTS

In total, 668 patients completed the programme. The mean age of patients was 45.9 ± 11.3 years and the majority of patients (69 %) were female. Three months post programme, significant improvements in all self report and objective physical measures were demonstrated (p < 0.001). Factors associated with a positive outcome included lower levels of baseline disability and distress, less baseline functional impairment, shorter duration of symptoms and not being involved in litigation.

CONCLUSION

This group-based education/exercise programme proved effective in terms of decreasing pain, improving physical function and improving psychosocial status. Identifying factors predictive of positive outcome may help maximise patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

下腰痛(LBP)可能难以治疗。提倡以教育和锻炼为形式的保守治疗作为一线治疗选择。运动方案的形式不同,改善的程度也不同。通常采用个体和团体护理模式。

目的

确定在爱尔兰东南部一所教学医院的一组 LBP 患者中,群体教育/锻炼干预的效果。此外,该研究还探讨了哪些因素是积极结果的预测因素。

方法

纳入年龄在 18-65 岁之间、腰痛时间超过 6 个月且完成该计划的患者。将结果指标进行编码、输入 PASW 18 并进行清理。使用配对 t 检验和 χ(2)分析对治疗前后的评分进行分析。使用多元回归模型确定哪些基线变量是积极结果的独立预测因素。

结果

共有 668 名患者完成了该计划。患者的平均年龄为 45.9±11.3 岁,大多数患者(69%)为女性。在计划完成后的 3 个月,所有自我报告和客观身体测量指标均显示出显著改善(p<0.001)。与积极结果相关的因素包括较低的基线残疾和痛苦程度、较低的基线功能障碍、较短的症状持续时间以及不参与诉讼。

结论

该基于群体的教育/锻炼计划在减轻疼痛、改善身体功能和改善心理社会状态方面是有效的。确定积极结果的预测因素可能有助于最大限度地提高患者的治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of a group education/exercise intervention in a population of patients with non-specific low back pain: a 3-year review.非特异性下腰痛患者群体的教育/运动干预的结果:3 年回顾。
Ir J Med Sci. 2014 Sep;183(3):341-50. doi: 10.1007/s11845-013-1013-z. Epub 2013 Sep 15.
2
Identifying psychosocial characteristics that predict outcome to the UPLIFT programme for people with persistent back pain: protocol for a prospective cohort study.确定预测 UPLIFT 项目对持续性腰痛患者疗效的心理社会特征:一项前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 10;9(8):e028747. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028747.
3
An educational approach based on a non-injury model compared with individual symptom-based physical training in chronic LBP. A pragmatic, randomised trial with a one-year follow-up.基于非损伤模型的教育方法与基于个体症状的慢性下腰痛物理训练的比较。一项具有一年随访的实用随机试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Sep 17;11:212. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-212.
4
Active exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy for persistent disabling low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.针对持续性致残性腰痛的主动运动、教育及认知行为疗法:一项随机对照试验
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jul 1;32(15):1578-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074f890.
5
The relationship of anticipated pain and fear avoidance beliefs to outcome in patients with chronic low back pain who are not receiving workers' compensation.未领取工伤赔偿的慢性下腰痛患者预期疼痛和恐惧回避信念与治疗结果的关系。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 1;30(9):1051-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000160848.94706.83.
6
Advice for the management of low back pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.腰痛管理建议:随机对照试验的系统评价
Man Ther. 2007 Nov;12(4):310-27. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.12.009. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
7
A comparison of manual therapy and active rehabilitation in the treatment of non specific low back pain with particular reference to a patient's Linton & Hallden psychological screening score: a pilot study.手法治疗与主动康复治疗非特异性下背痛的比较,特别参考患者的林顿和哈尔登心理筛查评分:一项初步研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Nov 1;8:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-106.
8
The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to management of low back pain in general practice: A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial.基层医疗中运用早期锻炼减少恐惧(FREE)方法治疗腰痛:一项实用的聚类随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 9;16(9):e1002897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002897. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
The access randomized clinical trial of public versus private physiotherapy for low back pain.公共与私人物理治疗低腰痛的随机临床试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 15;37(2):85-96. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182127457.
10
The efficacy of a multimodal physical activity intervention with supervised exercises, health coaching and an activity monitor on physical activity levels of patients with chronic, nonspecific low back pain (Physical Activity for Back Pain (PAyBACK) trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项包含监督锻炼、健康指导及活动监测的多模式体育活动干预对慢性非特异性下腰痛患者身体活动水平的疗效(背痛身体活动(PAyBACK)试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jan 15;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2436-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Low back pain in healthy postmenopausal women and the effect of physical activity: A secondary analysis in a randomized trial.健康绝经后女性的下背痛及体育活动的影响:一项随机试验的二次分析
PLoS One. 2017 May 10;12(5):e0177370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177370. eCollection 2017.
2
The effectiveness of a stratified group intervention using the STarTBack screening tool in patients with LBP--a non randomised controlled trial.分层组干预使用 STarTBack 筛查工具对腰痛患者的疗效——一项非随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Dec 5;14:342. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-342.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-reported pain severity, quality of life, disability, anxiety and depression in patients classified with 'nociceptive', 'peripheral neuropathic' and 'central sensitisation' pain. The discriminant validity of mechanisms-based classifications of low back (±leg) pain.“伤害性”、“外周神经性”和“中枢敏化”疼痛患者的自我报告疼痛严重程度、生活质量、残疾情况、焦虑和抑郁。下背部(±腿部)疼痛基于机制分类的判别效度。
Man Ther. 2012 Apr;17(2):119-25. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
2
A randomized trial comparing yoga, stretching, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain.一项比较瑜伽、伸展运动和一本自我护理书籍对慢性下背痛疗效的随机试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Dec 12;171(22):2019-26. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.524. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
3
Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial.分层初级保健管理与当前最佳实践治疗腰痛的比较(STarT Back):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
4
It's time for change with the management of non-specific chronic low back pain.非特异性慢性下腰痛的管理需要变革了。
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;46(4):224-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.081638. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
5
The validity of O'Sullivan's classification system (CS) for a sub-group of NS-CLBP with motor control impairment (MCI): overview of a series of studies and review of the literature.奥沙利文分类系统(CS)用于伴有运动控制障碍(MCI)的非特异性慢性下腰痛(NS-CLBP)亚组的有效性:一系列研究综述及文献回顾
Man Ther. 2011 Feb;16(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
6
Are prognostic indicators for poor outcome different for acute and chronic low back pain consulters in primary care?在初级保健中,急性和慢性腰痛就诊者的预后不良指标是否不同?
Pain. 2010 Dec;151(3):790-797. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
7
Contributions of prognostic factors for poor outcome in primary care low back pain patients.初级保健下腰痛患者预后不良的预后因素的贡献。
Eur J Pain. 2011 Mar;15(3):313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.07.008. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
8
Subgrouping patients with low back pain in primary care: are we getting any better at it?基层医疗中腰痛患者的亚组划分:我们在这方面是否有所进步?
Man Ther. 2011 Feb;16(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.05.013. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
9
Does targeting manual therapy and/or exercise improve patient outcomes in nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review.针对手法治疗和/或运动是否能改善非特异性下腰痛患者的结局?系统评价。
BMC Med. 2010 Apr 8;8:22. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-22.
10
Contemporary low back pain research - and implications for practice.当代下背痛研究——对实践的启示。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;24(2):291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.01.001.