门诊治疗痔疮时红外线光凝术与双极透热疗法的随机对照比较。

A randomized comparison of infrared photocoagulation with bipolar diathermy for the outpatient treatment of hemorrhoids.

作者信息

Dennison A, Whiston R J, Rooney S, Chadderton R D, Wherry D C, Morris D L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1990 Jan;33(1):32-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02053198.

DOI:10.1007/BF02053198

PMID:2403905

Abstract

One hundred two patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids were randomized to receive treatment with either infrared photocoagulation (IRPC) or a bipolar diathermy probe (BD). There was no significant difference in complications, number of treatments required (IRPC 1.7 [0.9], BD 1.6 [0.8]). Third-degree hemorrhoids required more treatments than smaller piles. BD has some practical advantages over IRPC but results are similar.

摘要

102例有症状的痔疮患者被随机分为两组，分别接受红外光凝治疗（IRPC）或双极透热探针治疗（BD）。两组在并发症、所需治疗次数方面无显著差异（IRPC组为1.7[0.9]次，BD组为1.6[0.8]次）。三度痔疮比小一些的痔核需要更多的治疗次数。与IRPC相比，BD有一些实际优势，但治疗结果相似。