Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 11;8(9):e73833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073833. eCollection 2013.
Immune priming has been shown to occur in a wide array of invertebrate taxa, with individuals exposed to a pathogen showing increased protection upon subsequent exposure. However, the mechanisms underlying immune priming are poorly understood. The antiviral RNAi response in Drosophila melanogaster is an ideal candidate for providing a specific and acquired response to subsequent infection. We exposed D. melanogaster to two challenges of a virus known to produce an antiviral RNAi response, to examine whether any protective effects of prior exposure on survival were observed.
In this experiment we found no evidence that prior exposure to Drosophila C Virus (DCV) protects flies from a subsequent lethal challenge, with almost identical levels of mortality in flies previously exposed to DCV or a control.
Our results confirm the finding that 'acquired' immune responses are not ubiquitous across all invertebrate-pathogen interactions. We discuss why we may have observed no effect in this study, with focus on the mechanistic basis of the RNAi pathway.
免疫原性已在广泛的无脊椎动物分类群中被证实,暴露于病原体的个体在随后的暴露中会显示出更高的保护作用。然而,免疫原性的机制仍不清楚。在黑腹果蝇中,抗病毒 RNAi 反应是对后续感染提供特异性和获得性反应的理想候选者。我们使黑腹果蝇暴露于两种已知会产生抗病毒 RNAi 反应的病毒的挑战中,以检查先前暴露是否对存活率有任何保护作用。
在本实验中,我们没有发现先前暴露于果蝇 C 病毒 (DCV) 可以保护果蝇免受随后致命性挑战的证据,先前暴露于 DCV 或对照的果蝇的死亡率几乎相同。
我们的结果证实了“获得性”免疫反应并非在所有无脊椎动物-病原体相互作用中普遍存在的发现。我们讨论了为什么在这项研究中我们没有观察到任何影响,重点是 RNAi 途径的机制基础。