Oosthuizen Maria Kathleen, Scheibler Anne-Gita, Bennett Nigel Charles, Amrein Irmgard
Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 11;8(9):e75863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075863. eCollection 2013.
A large number of laboratory and field based studies are being carried out on mole-rats, both in our research group and others. Several studies have highlighted the development of adverse behaviours in laboratory animals and have emphasised the importance of enrichment for captive animals. Hence we were interested in evaluating how laboratory housing would affect behavioural performance in mole-rats. We investigated exploratory behaviour, the ability to discriminate between novel and familiar environments and reference memory in the solitary Cape mole-rat (Georychus capensis). Our data showed that both wild and captive animals readily explore open spaces and tunnels. Wild animals were however more active than their captive counterparts. In the Y maze two trial discrimination task, wild animals failed to discriminate between novel and familiar environments, while laboratory housed mole-rats showed preferential spatial discrimination in terms of the length of time spent in the novel arm. The performance of the laboratory and wild animals were similar when tested for reference memory in the Y maze, both groups showed a significant improvement compared to the first day, from the 3rd day onwards. Wild animals made more mistakes whereas laboratory animals were slower in completing the task. The difference in performance between wild and laboratory animals in the Y-maze may be as a result of the lower activity of the laboratory animals. Laboratory maintained Cape mole-rats show classic behaviours resulting from a lack of stimulation such as reduced activity and increased aggression. However, they do display an improved novelty discrimination compared to the wild animals. Slower locomotion rate of the laboratory animals may increase the integration time of stimuli, hence result in a more thorough inspection of the surroundings. Unlike the captive animals, wild animals show flexibility in their responses to unpredictable events, which is an important requirement under natural living conditions.
我们的研究团队以及其他团队都在对鼹形鼠进行大量基于实验室和实地的研究。多项研究突出了实验动物中不良行为的发展,并强调了对圈养动物进行环境富集的重要性。因此,我们有兴趣评估实验室饲养环境会如何影响鼹形鼠的行为表现。我们研究了独居的开普鼹形鼠(Georychus capensis)的探索行为、区分新环境和熟悉环境的能力以及参考记忆。我们的数据表明,野生和圈养的动物都很乐意探索开放空间和隧道。然而,野生动物比圈养的同类更活跃。在Y迷宫双试验辨别任务中,野生动物无法区分新环境和熟悉环境,而实验室饲养的鼹形鼠在新臂停留的时间长度方面表现出优先的空间辨别能力。当在Y迷宫中测试参考记忆时,实验室动物和野生动物的表现相似;从第三天起,两组与第一天相比都有显著改善。野生动物犯错更多,而实验室动物完成任务的速度较慢。Y迷宫中野生和实验室动物表现的差异可能是由于实验室动物活动水平较低。实验室饲养的松果鼹形鼠表现出因缺乏刺激而产生的典型行为,如活动减少和攻击性增加。然而,与野生动物相比,它们确实表现出更好的新奇辨别能力。实验室动物较慢的运动速度可能会增加刺激的整合时间,从而导致对周围环境进行更彻底的检查。与圈养动物不同,野生动物对不可预测事件的反应具有灵活性,这是自然生活条件下的一项重要要求。