Matsumoto Simone Ferreira Borges, Motta Lara Jansiski, Alfaya Thays Almeida, Guedes Carolina Cardoso, Fernandes Kristianne Porta Santos, Bussadori Sandra Kalil
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences Post Graduation Program, Nove de Julho University (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil.
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jul-Aug;24(4):488-92. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.118393.
Chemomechanical removal of carious lesions consists of the dissolution of carious tissue by the application of a natural or synthetic agent, followed by atraumatic mechanical removal.
The aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of Papacarie Duo ® gel in the chemomechanical removal of carious lesions in primary teeth in comparison to the traditional method (low-speed bur).
A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 20 children between 5 and 8 years of age.
Two teeth were treated in each child (split-mouth design), with the randomization of two methods: Group 1 - chemomechanical caries removal with Papacarie Duo™; and Group 2 - removal of carious dentin tissue using a low-speed bur. Both methods involved restoration with glass ionomer cement and follow up. The following aspects were evaluated: time required for the procedure; pain (face evaluation scale); retention of the restorative material in the cavity; and the presence of secondary caries after 30 days.
Chi-squared test, Student's t-test, and Wilcoxon test.
No statistically significant differences between methods were found regarding time required for the procedure (P = 0.13), the occurrence of pain (P = 0.585), or restoration status at the 30-day clinical evaluation (P = 0.713).
The findings of the present study demonstrate that the two methods achieve similar results. The advantages of minimally invasive treatment, such as chemomechanical caries removal with Papacarie Duo™, are its ease of use, patient comfort, and the fact that it causes less damage to dental tissue.
龋损的化学机械去除包括通过应用天然或合成剂溶解龋坏组织,随后进行无创性机械去除。
本研究的目的是评估与传统方法(低速车针)相比,Papacarie Duo®凝胶在乳牙龋损化学机械去除中的有效性。
对20名5至8岁儿童进行了一项随机临床试验。
每名儿童治疗两颗牙齿(双侧对照设计),随机采用两种方法:第1组——使用Papacarie Duo™进行化学机械性龋病去除;第2组——使用低速车针去除龋坏牙本质组织。两种方法均包括用玻璃离子水门汀修复并随访。评估了以下方面:操作所需时间;疼痛(面部评估量表);修复材料在窝洞内的保留情况;以及30天后继发龋的存在情况。
卡方检验、学生t检验和威尔科克森检验。
在操作所需时间(P = 0.13)、疼痛发生率(P = 0.585)或30天临床评估时的修复状况(P = 0.713)方面,两种方法之间未发现统计学显著差异。
本研究结果表明,两种方法取得了相似的结果。微创治疗的优点,如使用Papacarie Duo™进行化学机械性龋病去除,在于其使用方便、患者舒适度高,以及对牙体组织造成的损伤较小。