Seoul Highan Dental Clinic, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2013 Aug;5(3):219-25. doi: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.219. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
Few studies have investigated the marginal accuracy of 3-unit zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of zirconia FPDs made using two CAD/CAM systems with that of metal-ceramic FPDs.
Artificial resin maxillary central and lateral incisors were prepared for 3-unit FPDs and fixed in yellow stone. This model was duplicated to epoxy resin die. On the resin die, 15 three-unit FPDs were fabricated per group (45 in total): Group A, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Everest system; Group B, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Lava system; and Group C, metal-ceramic 3-unit FPDs. They were cemented to resin dies with resin cement. After removal of pontic, each retainer was separated and observed under a microscope (Presize 440C). Marginal gaps of experimental groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan test.
Mean marginal gaps of 3-unit FPDs were 60.46 µm for the Everest group, 78.71 µm for the Lava group, and 81.32 µm for the metal-ceramic group. The Everest group demonstrated significantly smaller marginal gap than the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P<.05). The marginal gap did not significantly differ between the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P>.05).
The marginal gaps of anterior 3-unit zirconia FPD differed according to CAD/CAM systems, but still fell within clinically acceptable ranges compared with conventional metal-ceramic restoration.
鲜有研究调查过计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)系统制作的 3 单位氧化锆固定局部义齿(FPD)的边缘精度。本研究的目的是比较两种 CAD/CAM 系统制作的氧化锆 FPD 的边缘适合性与金属陶瓷 FPD 的边缘适合性。
人工树脂上颌中切牙和侧切牙被制备成 3 单位 FPD,并固定在黄石头中。该模型被复制到环氧树脂模具上。在树脂模具上,每组制作 15 个 3 单位 FPD(共 45 个):A 组,使用 Everest 系统制作的氧化锆 3 单位 FPD;B 组,使用 Lava 系统制作的氧化锆 3 单位 FPD;C 组,金属陶瓷 3 单位 FPD。它们用树脂水泥粘接到树脂模具上。去除桥体后,每个固位体被分离并在显微镜下观察(Presize 440C)。使用单因素方差分析和 Duncan 检验分析实验组的边缘间隙。
Everest 组的 3 单位 FPD 的平均边缘间隙为 60.46 µm,Lava 组为 78.71 µm,金属陶瓷组为 81.32 µm。Everest 组的边缘间隙明显小于 Lava 组和金属陶瓷组(P<.05)。Lava 组和金属陶瓷组之间的边缘间隙无显著差异(P>.05)。
根据 CAD/CAM 系统,前牙 3 单位氧化锆 FPD 的边缘间隙有所不同,但与传统金属陶瓷修复体相比仍在临床可接受范围内。