• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗的演变概念:聚焦东亚的独特特征与“亚洲悖论”

The Evolving Concept of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Focus on Unique Feature of East Asian and "Asian Paradox".

作者信息

Kang Jeehoon, Kim Hyo Soo

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean Circ J. 2018 Jul;48(7):537-551. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0166.

DOI:10.4070/kcj.2018.0166
PMID:29968428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6031716/
Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is essential after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), while many studies have focused on determining the optimal degree of platelet inhibition and optimal DAPT duration to minimize complications after PCI. Current guidelines developed by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the European Society of Cardiology summarize previous studies and provide recommendations. However, these guidelines are mainly based on Western patients, and their characteristics might differ from those of East Asian patients. Previous data suggested that East Asian patients have unique features with regard to the response to antiplatelet agents. On comparing Western and East Asian patients, it was found that East Asian patients have a lower rate of ischemic events and higher rate of bleeding events after PCI, despite a higher on-treatment platelet reactivity, which is referred to as the "East Asian paradox." As the main purpose of DAPT is to minimize ischemic and bleeding complications after PCI, these differences should be clarified before adopting the guidelines for East Asian patients. Therefore, in this article, we will review various issues regarding DAPT in East Asian patients, with a focus on the unique characteristics of East Asian patients, previous studies regarding antiplatelet agents in East Asian patients, and a guideline from an East Asian perspective.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,阿司匹林与P2Y12抑制剂联合的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)至关重要,同时许多研究致力于确定最佳的血小板抑制程度和最佳DAPT疗程,以尽量减少PCI后的并发症。美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会以及欧洲心脏病学会制定的现行指南总结了既往研究并给出了推荐意见。然而,这些指南主要基于西方患者,其特征可能与东亚患者不同。既往数据表明,东亚患者在抗血小板药物反应方面具有独特特征。比较西方和东亚患者发现,尽管PCI后东亚患者治疗期间的血小板反应性较高,但缺血事件发生率较低,出血事件发生率较高,这被称为“东亚悖论”。由于DAPT的主要目的是尽量减少PCI后的缺血和出血并发症,在将这些指南应用于东亚患者之前,应先明确这些差异。因此,在本文中,我们将回顾东亚患者DAPT的各种问题,重点关注东亚患者的独特特征、既往关于东亚患者抗血小板药物的研究以及东亚视角的指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc54/6031716/b4de062e499b/kcj-48-537-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc54/6031716/76c4d08144f8/kcj-48-537-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc54/6031716/e6f08047672d/kcj-48-537-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc54/6031716/b4de062e499b/kcj-48-537-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc54/6031716/76c4d08144f8/kcj-48-537-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc54/6031716/e6f08047672d/kcj-48-537-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc54/6031716/b4de062e499b/kcj-48-537-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Evolving Concept of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Focus on Unique Feature of East Asian and "Asian Paradox".经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗的演变概念:聚焦东亚的独特特征与“亚洲悖论”
Korean Circ J. 2018 Jul;48(7):537-551. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0166.
2
Antithrombotic Strategy for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Perspective from East Asia.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的抗栓策略:来自东亚的观点
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 23;9(6):1963. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061963.
3
Expert consensus document: World Heart Federation expert consensus statement on antiplatelet therapy in East Asian patients with ACS or undergoing PCI.专家共识文件:世界心脏联合会专家共识声明:抗血小板治疗在东亚 ACS 或 PCI 患者中的应用。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Oct;11(10):597-606. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.104. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term and Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Comparison between Asians and Non-Asians.长期与短期双重抗血小板治疗的疗效与安全性:亚洲人与非亚洲人比较的荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 28;9(3):652. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030652.
5
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review for the 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.双联抗血小板治疗的疗程:针对2016年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠心病患者双联抗血小板治疗疗程重点更新指南的系统评价:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e156-78. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000405. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
6
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration Based on Ischemic and Bleeding Risks After Coronary Stenting.双联抗血小板治疗的持续时间基于冠状动脉支架置入术后的缺血和出血风险。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 26;73(7):741-754. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.048.
7
Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI: integrating procedural complexity, bleeding risk and the acuteness of clinical presentation.PCI术后双联抗血小板治疗的最佳疗程:整合手术复杂性、出血风险及临床表现的紧急程度
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Oct;16(10):735-748. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1523718. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
8
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review for the 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.双联抗血小板治疗时间:2016 年 ACC/AHA 指南双联抗血小板治疗时间的聚焦更新:冠心病患者双联抗血小板治疗时间的临床实践指南——美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会工作组报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1116-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.512. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
9
Antithrombotic Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndromes or Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in East Asian Populations.东亚人群急性冠状动脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的抗栓治疗
JACC Asia. 2022 Feb 15;2(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.005. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Prediction of Ischemic and Bleeding Events Using the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score in an Unrestricted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Population.在不受限制的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗人群中使用双联抗血小板治疗评分预测缺血和出血事件。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e006853. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006853.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoding Bleeding Risks and Survival in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Antiplatelet Therapy.解读接受抗血小板治疗的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的出血风险和生存率
JACC Asia. 2025 Sep;5(9):1083-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.05.017. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
2
Position Statement on Antiplatelet Therapy for East Asians With Coronary Artery Disease: 2025 Update.《2025年东亚冠状动脉疾病患者抗血小板治疗立场声明更新版》
JACC Asia. 2025 Jul;5(7):821-846. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.04.010.
3
Dual antiplatelet therapy in GI-bleed patients with extensive coronary artery disease history: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Third-Generation P2Y12 Inhibitors in East Asian Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Nationwide Prospective Multicentre Study.东亚急性心肌梗死患者中的第三代 P2Y12 抑制剂:一项全国范围的前瞻性多中心研究。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Mar;118(3):591-600. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1626697. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
2
Association of different antiplatelet therapies with mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.不同抗血小板治疗与初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后死亡率的关系。
Heart. 2018 Oct;104(20):1683-1690. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312366. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
3
[2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS.].
有广泛冠状动脉疾病史的胃肠道出血患者的双重抗血小板治疗:一项系统评价
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 25;87(6):3715-3735. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002833. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
A Novel Approach to Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk Stratification and Proton Pump Inhibitor Effectiveness in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.一种针对接受双联抗血小板治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者胃肠道出血风险分层及质子泵抑制剂疗效的新方法:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s10557-025-07702-4.
5
Trends in dual antiplatelet therapy regimens and clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: A multicenter real-world study.接受药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者双重抗血小板治疗方案及临床结局的趋势:一项多中心真实世界研究
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2024 Nov 14;11(1):57-68. doi: 10.1002/cdt3.154. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
The predictive value of the ARC-HBR criteria for in-hospital bleeding risk following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后ARC-HBR标准对院内出血风险的预测价值。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Oct 19;55:101527. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101527. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Are Bleeding Events Valid as a Surrogate Endpoint for Mortality in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials?出血事件能否作为心血管临床试验中死亡率的替代终点?
JACC Adv. 2023 May 26;2(3):100335. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100335. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Author's Reply to Kow et al.: "Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in East-Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Large Cohort Study".作者对Kow等人的回复:“东亚急性冠状动脉综合征患者中替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷临床结局的比较:大型队列研究”
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024 Mar;24(2):327-328. doi: 10.1007/s40256-023-00627-z. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
9
Shortened Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary Clinical Review.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗疗程的缩短:一项当代临床综述
Interv Cardiol. 2023 Dec 11;18:e31. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.19. eCollection 2023.
10
Do We Still Need Aspirin in Coronary Artery Disease?在冠状动脉疾病中我们仍然需要阿司匹林吗?
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 6;12(24):7534. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247534.
[2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗重点更新版。]
Kardiol Pol. 2017;75(12):1217-1299. doi: 10.5603/KP.2017.0224.
4
The Use Pattern and Clinical Impact of New Antiplatelet Agents Including Prasugrel and Ticagrelor on 30-day Outcomes after Acute Myocardial Infarction in Korea: Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Data.包括普拉格雷和替格瑞洛在内的新型抗血小板药物在韩国急性心肌梗死后30天结局中的使用模式及临床影响:韩国健康保险审查与评估数据
Korean Circ J. 2017 Nov;47(6):888-897. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0072. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
5
2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗重点更新:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗特别工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.
6
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for 6 Versus 18 Months After Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.生物可吸收聚合物药物洗脱支架置入 6 个月与 18 个月后双联抗血小板治疗。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1189-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.019.
7
Platelet function monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients stented for an acute coronary syndrome (ANTARCTIC): an open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled superiority trial.血小板功能监测以调整急性冠状动脉综合征支架置入老年患者的抗血小板治疗(南极洲研究):一项开放标签、盲终点、随机对照优势试验
Lancet. 2016 Oct 22;388(10055):2015-2022. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31323-X. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
8
Outcomes in patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel after acute myocardial infarction: experiences from SWEDEHEART registry.急性心肌梗死后使用替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷治疗的患者结局:来自 SWEDEHEART 注册研究的经验。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Nov 21;37(44):3335-3342. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw284. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
9
6-Month Versus 12-Month Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Following Long Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: The IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial.长期依维莫司洗脱支架置入后 6 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:血管内超声-XPL 随机临床试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul 25;9(14):1438-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.036. Epub 2016 May 17.
10
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review for the 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.双联抗血小板治疗时间:2016 年 ACC/AHA 指南双联抗血小板治疗时间的聚焦更新:冠心病患者双联抗血小板治疗时间的临床实践指南——美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会工作组报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1116-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.512. Epub 2016 Mar 29.