Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1430-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
To evaluate our 5-year experience with deep lateral transurethral incisions of bladder neck contracture (TUIBNC), identify risk factors associated with failure of procedure, and assess outcomes of men subsequently treated for concomitant or de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
We reviewed 50 consecutive patients who underwent TUIBNC between June 2007 and January 2012. TUIBNC was standardized to include initial dilation followed by deep transurethral incisions. All patients were evaluated cystoscopically after a 2-month interval; those with recurrent bladder neck contracture (RBNC) underwent a second TUIBNC. For patients with concomitant SUI, we assessed the timing between TUIBNC and subsequent artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement and its outcome. Perioperative characteristics were reviewed to identify factors associated with failure.
Of the 50 patients analyzed, most were refractory, 78% having failed previous TUIBNC. After TUIBNC, 72% required no further surgery for obstruction at a mean follow-up of 12.9 months. Of the 14 who failed initial TUIBNC, 7 underwent repeat TUIBNC with success, representing an overall success rate of 86% after 2 procedures. Significant factors associated with treatment failure were >10 pack/year smoking history (P = .039) and ≥ 2 previous endoscopic BNC procedures (P = .03). Of 39 men (78%) with concomitant SUI, two-thirds underwent AUS placement after an average of 2.9 months after TUIBNC. Only 2 of 26 (8%) patients required repeat transurethral procedures after AUS placement for RBNC.
Deep lateral TUIBNC alone is a highly effective treatment modality for RBNC. Smokers and those having 2 or more previous transurethral procedures appear to have greater risk for failure. Subsequent AUS placement can be safely performed with >90% long-term urethral patency.
评估我们在经尿道膀胱颈部切开术(TUIBNC)治疗膀胱颈部挛缩的 5 年经验,确定与手术失败相关的风险因素,并评估随后因压力性尿失禁(SUI)而接受治疗的男性的结局。
我们回顾了 2007 年 6 月至 2012 年 1 月期间连续 50 例接受 TUIBNC 的患者。TUIBNC 标准化为包括初始扩张,然后进行深层经尿道切开术。所有患者在 2 个月间隔后接受膀胱镜检查;那些出现复发性膀胱颈部挛缩(RBNC)的患者接受第二次 TUIBNC。对于同时患有 SUI 的患者,我们评估了 TUIBNC 与随后的人工尿道括约肌(AUS)放置之间的时间及其结果。回顾围手术期特征以确定与失败相关的因素。
在分析的 50 例患者中,大多数为难治性患者,78%的患者先前已行 TUIBNC 失败。TUIBNC 后,72%的患者在平均 12.9 个月的随访中无需进一步手术治疗梗阻。在最初的 TUIBNC 失败的 14 例患者中,有 7 例患者再次接受 TUIBNC 成功,2 次手术后的总体成功率为 86%。与治疗失败相关的显著因素是 >10 包/年吸烟史(P =.039)和≥2 次先前的内镜 BNC 手术(P =.03)。在 39 例(78%)同时患有 SUI 的男性中,2/3 例在 TUIBNC 后平均 2.9 个月后接受了 AUS 放置。在 AUS 放置后,仅 2/26(8%)例患者因 RBNC 需要再次经尿道手术。
单纯深层外侧 TUIBNC 是治疗 RBNC 的一种非常有效的治疗方法。吸烟者和那些有 2 次或更多次经尿道手术的人似乎有更大的失败风险。随后的 AUS 放置可以安全进行,90%以上的患者长期尿道通畅。