Department of Psychiatry, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Jan 3;48:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
Numerous studies have reported that inflammation is closely associated with depression, and adjunctive non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment has been suggested as a novel therapeutic approach for depression.
We searched electronic databases including Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We only included randomized controlled trials comparing adjunctive NSAIDs with placebos for treating depressive episodes.
Of the 654 retrieved entries, we identified four relevant studies with a total of 150 patients (75 NSAID patients and 75 placebo patients) with depressive episodes. All four studies used celecoxib as the NSAID. The patients receiving adjunctive celecoxib had significantly higher mean changes in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores between baseline and endpoint measurements compared with those receiving placebo (weighted mean difference=3.26, 95% confidence interval; CI=1.81 to 4.71). The adjunctive celecoxib group also showed better remission (odds ratio; OR=6.58, 95% CI=2.55 to 17.00) and response rates (OR=6.49, 95% CI=2.89 to 14.55) than the placebo group. The all-cause drop-out rate was more favorable for the celecoxib group than for the placebo group (OR=0.45, 95% CI=0.18 to 1.13), although the statistical significance was not statistically significant (p=0.09).
Adjunctive treatment with NSAIDs, particularly celecoxib, can be a promising strategy for patients with depressive disorder. Future studies with a larger sample size and longer study duration are needed to confirm the efficacy and tolerability of NSAIDs for depression.
大量研究表明炎症与抑郁密切相关,辅助使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)治疗已被提议作为治疗抑郁症的一种新方法。
我们检索了包括 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库在内的电子数据库。我们仅纳入了比较辅助 NSAID 与安慰剂治疗抑郁发作的随机对照试验。
在 654 篇检索文献中,我们确定了四项相关研究,共纳入了 150 名患有抑郁发作的患者(75 名 NSAID 患者和 75 名安慰剂患者)。四项研究均使用塞来昔布作为 NSAID。与接受安慰剂的患者相比,接受辅助塞来昔布治疗的患者在汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分的基线与终点测量之间的平均变化显著更高(加权均数差值=3.26,95%置信区间;CI=1.81 至 4.71)。辅助塞来昔布组的缓解率(比值比;OR=6.58,95%CI=2.55 至 17.00)和反应率(OR=6.49,95%CI=2.89 至 14.55)也优于安慰剂组。全因脱落率对塞来昔布组更为有利,而对安慰剂组不利(OR=0.45,95%CI=0.18 至 1.13),尽管统计学意义不显著(p=0.09)。
辅助使用 NSAID,特别是塞来昔布,可能是治疗抑郁症患者的一种有前途的策略。需要进行更大样本量和更长研究时间的未来研究,以确认 NSAID 治疗抑郁症的疗效和耐受性。