School of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Caries Res. 2013;47(6):601-11. doi: 10.1159/000351641. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
To quantify the relationships between buffering properties and acid erosion and hence improve models of erosive potential of acidic drinks, a pH-stat was used to measure the rate of enamel dissolution in solutions of citric, malic and lactic acids, with pH 2.4-3.6 and with acid concentrations adjusted to give buffer capacities (β) of 2-40 (mmol·l(-1))·pH(-1) for each pH. The corresponding undissociated acid concentrations, [HA], and titratable acidity to pH 5.5 (TA5.5) were calculated. In relation to β, the dissolution rate and the strength of response to β varied with acid type (lactic > malic ≥ citric) and decreased as pH increased. The patterns of variation of the dissolution rate with TA5.5 were qualitatively similar to those for β, except that increasing pH above 2.8 had less effect on dissolution in citric and malic acids and none on dissolution in lactic acid. Variations of the dissolution rate with [HA] showed no systematic dependence on acid type but some dependence on pH. The results suggest that [HA], rather than buffering per se, is a major rate-controlling factor, probably owing to the importance of undissociated acid as a readily diffusible source of H(+) ions in maintaining near-surface dissolution within the softened layer of enamel. TA5.5 was more closely correlated with [HA] than was β, and seems to be the preferred practical measure of buffering. The relationship between [HA] and TA5.5 differs between mono- and polybasic acids, so a separate analysis of products according to predominant acid type could improve multivariate models of erosive potential.
为了量化缓冲性能与酸蚀之间的关系,从而改进酸性饮料腐蚀性潜力的模型,本研究采用 pH 滴定法来测量在 pH 2.4-3.6 条件下柠檬酸、苹果酸和乳酸溶液中釉质的溶解速率,酸浓度经调整后缓冲容量(β)分别为 2-40(mmol·l(-1))·pH(-1)。相应的未解离酸浓度[HA]和滴定酸度至 pH 5.5(TA5.5)被计算出来。与β相关的是,溶解速率和对β的响应强度随酸类型而变化(乳酸>苹果酸≥柠檬酸),并且随着 pH 值的增加而降低。溶解速率随 TA5.5 的变化模式与β的变化模式在定性上相似,只是在 pH 高于 2.8 时柠檬酸和苹果酸的溶解速率变化较小,而乳酸的溶解速率没有变化。溶解速率随[HA]的变化没有表现出与酸类型的系统依赖性,但与 pH 值有一定的依赖性。结果表明,[HA]而不是缓冲本身是主要的速率控制因素,这可能是由于未解离酸作为维持釉质软化层内近表面溶解的易扩散 H(+)离子源的重要性。TA5.5 与[HA]的相关性比β更密切,似乎是缓冲的首选实际测量指标。[HA]和 TA5.5 之间的关系在一元酸和多元酸之间有所不同,因此根据主要酸类型对产品进行单独分析可以改进腐蚀性潜力的多元模型。