• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较:一项具有 11 年经验的前瞻性随机研究。

Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for management of endometrial carcinoma: a prospective randomized study with 11-year experience.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Gongti South Road, No. 8, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov;139(11):1853-9. doi: 10.1007/s00432-013-1504-3. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00432-013-1504-3
PMID:24061340
Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared laparoscopic approach with the conventional laparotomy approach for the treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma in developing country.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-two patients with endometrial carcinoma were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial and treated with laparoscopic or laparotomy approach.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-one patients were treated by laparoscopy, while one hundred and twenty-one patients were treated by laparotomy. The median operative time was 211 min in the laparoscopy group and 231 min in the laparotomy group (P > 0.05). The median blood loss was 86 ml in the laparoscopy group and 419 ml in the laparotomy group (P < 0.05). The median length of hospital stay was 3 days in the laparoscopy group and 6 days in the laparotomy group (P < 0.05). Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in all the patients. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in 15 % of the laparoscopy and 31.4 % of laparotomy group (P < 0.05). The overall survival and 5-year survival rate for the TLH were 94 and 96 % compared with 90.1 and 91 % in the TAH, respectively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery is a safe and reliable alternative to laparotomy in the management of endometrial carcinoma patients, with significantly reduced hospital stay and postoperative complications; however, it does not seem to improve the overall survival and 5-year survival rate, although multicenter randomized trials are required to evaluate the overall oncologic outcomes of this procedure.

摘要

目的

我们比较了腹腔镜方法与传统剖腹手术方法在发展中国家治疗子宫内膜癌患者的效果。

方法

将 272 例子宫内膜癌患者纳入一项前瞻性随机试验中,并分别采用腹腔镜或剖腹手术方法进行治疗。

结果

151 例患者接受了腹腔镜治疗,121 例患者接受了剖腹手术治疗。腹腔镜组的中位手术时间为 211 分钟,剖腹手术组为 231 分钟(P>0.05)。腹腔镜组的中位出血量为 86 毫升,剖腹手术组为 419 毫升(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组的中位住院时间为 3 天,剖腹手术组为 6 天(P<0.05)。所有患者均进行了盆腔淋巴结切除术,15%的腹腔镜组和 31.4%的剖腹手术组进行了腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术(P<0.05)。TLH 的总生存率和 5 年生存率分别为 94%和 96%,与 TAH 的 90.1%和 91%相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

与剖腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术在治疗子宫内膜癌患者方面是一种安全可靠的选择,可显著缩短住院时间和减少术后并发症;然而,它似乎并不能提高总生存率和 5 年生存率,尽管需要进行多中心随机试验来评估该手术的整体肿瘤学结局。

相似文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for management of endometrial carcinoma: a prospective randomized study with 11-year experience.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较:一项具有 11 年经验的前瞻性随机研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov;139(11):1853-9. doi: 10.1007/s00432-013-1504-3. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
2
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub2.
3
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与全子宫切除术(TAH)治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 May;20(4):570-5. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d8b105.
4
A Comparison of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic and Open Hysterectomy With or Without Lymphadenectomy for Presumed Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Results From the Medical Research Council ASTEC Trial.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术加或不加淋巴结清扫术治疗疑似早期子宫内膜癌的疗效比较:医学研究委员会ASTEC试验结果
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Oct;25(8):1424-36. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000521.
5
Lymphadenectomy or sentinel node biopsy for the management of endometrial cancer.用于子宫内膜癌治疗的淋巴结切除术或前哨淋巴结活检术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 10;6(6):CD015786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015786.pub2.
6
Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: systematic review.腹腔镜治疗子宫内膜癌:系统评价。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):413-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
7
Long-term outcome of patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer after pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: a comparison of laparoscopic vs. open procedure.中高危子宫内膜癌患者盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术后的长期结局:腹腔镜与开放手术的比较。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr;146(4):961-969. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03122-8. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
8
Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer.用于子宫内膜癌治疗的淋巴结切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 2;10(10):CD007585. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007585.pub4.
9
Survival advantage of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌淋巴结清扫术的生存优势。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 May;142(5):1051-60. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-2109-9. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
10
Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌治疗中的淋巴结切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 21;2015(9):CD007585. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007585.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Different surgical methods of hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.子宫内膜癌治疗中子宫切除术的不同手术方法:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 15;14:1524991. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1524991. eCollection 2024.
2
Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer, Hysterectomy Performed via Minimally Invasive Routes Compared with Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.子宫内膜癌的手术治疗:微创途径子宫切除术与开放手术的比较——系统评价与网状Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 13;16(10):1860. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101860.
3
Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer is oncologically safe and improves hospital stay duration: a retrospective single-center study over a 16-year period.

本文引用的文献

1
Two mechanical methods for thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaecological pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomised study.两种机械方法预防妇科盆腔手术后血栓栓塞:一项前瞻性、随机研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Dec;125(23):4259-63.
2
The incidence of isolated para-aortic nodal metastasis in completely staged endometrial cancer patients.完全分期子宫内膜癌患者孤立性腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的发生率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Apr;121(1):122-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.11.026. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
3
Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial.
腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌在肿瘤学上是安全的,并能缩短住院时间:一项回顾性单中心研究超过 16 年的时间。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Aug;310(2):1207-1213. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07550-x. Epub 2024 May 25.
4
Is robotic surgery beneficial for the treatment of endometrial cancer? A comparison with conventional laparoscopic surgery.机器人手术对子宫内膜癌的治疗有益吗?与传统腹腔镜手术的比较。
J Cancer. 2024 Jan 1;15(2):533-538. doi: 10.7150/jca.88187. eCollection 2024.
5
Laparoscopic vs. open procedure for intermediate‑ and high‑risk endometrial cancer: a minimum 4-year follow-up analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗中高危子宫内膜癌:至少 4 年随访分析。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 23;22(1):1203. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10301-3.
6
Surgical treatment of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma - laparotomy versus laparoscopy.子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌的手术治疗——开腹手术与腹腔镜手术对比
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2022 Dec 8;23(4):233-240. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2022.2021-12-2. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
7
Survival rates of patients who undergo minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer with cervical involvement.患有宫颈癌的子宫内膜癌患者行微创手术后的生存率。
Int J Med Sci. 2021 Mar 21;18(10):2204-2208. doi: 10.7150/ijms.55026. eCollection 2021.
8
Clinical and histopathologic analysis of gynecological cancer: a single institute experience over 7 years.妇科癌症的临床与组织病理学分析:一家机构7年的经验
Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2020 Jul;37(3):179-185. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2019.00451. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
9
Novel Surgical Strategies in the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies.妇科恶性肿瘤的新型手术策略。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018 Nov 9;19(12):73. doi: 10.1007/s11864-018-0582-5.
10
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 31;10(10):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub3.
腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的安全性比较:一项随机试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):763-71. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70143-1. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
4
Risk factors for postoperative lower-extremity lymphedema in endometrial cancer survivors who had treatment including lymphadenectomy.接受包括淋巴结清扫术在内的治疗的子宫内膜癌幸存者术后下肢淋巴水肿的危险因素。
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Oct;119(1):60-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.06.018. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
5
Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis.腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术对子宫内膜癌患者生存效果的影响(SEPAL 研究):一项回顾性队列分析。
Lancet. 2010 Apr 3;375(9721):1165-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62002-X. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
6
Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌治疗中的淋巴结切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD007585. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007585.pub2.
7
Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2.腹腔镜与开腹手术用于子宫癌全面外科分期的比较:妇科肿瘤学组研究 LAP2。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 10;27(32):5331-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3248. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
8
The incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes.盆腔淋巴结阴性的手术分期子宫内膜癌患者中孤立性腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的发生率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Nov;115(2):236-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.07.016. Epub 2009 Aug 9.
9
Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study.子宫内膜癌系统性盆腔淋巴结清扫术的疗效(MRC ASTEC试验):一项随机研究
Lancet. 2009 Jan 10;373(9658):125-36. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61766-3. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
10
Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial.早期子宫内膜癌系统性盆腔淋巴结清扫术与未行淋巴结清扫术的比较:随机临床试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Dec 3;100(23):1707-16. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn397. Epub 2008 Nov 25.