Rebuttal: When it comes to scientific inference, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
作者信息
Rothman Kenneth J, Gallacher John E J, Hatch Elizabeth E
机构信息
RTI Health Solutions, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, and Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
出版信息
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1026-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt124.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Rebuttal: When it comes to scientific inference, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.反驳：说到科学推断，有时一支雪茄就是一支雪茄。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1026-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt124.
2
Use of epidemiologic information in targeted surveillance for population inference.在目标监测中利用流行病学信息进行人群推断。
Prev Vet Med. 2009 May 1;89(1-2):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
3
Risk perception and cigar smoking behavior.风险认知与雪茄吸烟行为。
Am J Health Behav. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2):106-14. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.25.2.3.
4
[Epidemiologic research on cancer. The importance of population-based studies].[癌症的流行病学研究。基于人群研究的重要性]
Laeknabladid. 2006 May;92(5):362-3.
5
Why representativeness should be avoided.为何应避免代表性。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1012-4. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys223.
6
Avoidance of representativeness in presence of effect modification.在存在效应修正的情况下避免代表性。
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;43(2):630-1. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt263. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
7
Representativeness.代表性。
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;43(2):632-3. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt271. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
8
Commentary: Should we always deliberately be non-representative?评论：我们是否应该总是刻意地不具代表性？
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1022-6. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt105.
9
Commentary: Representativeness is usually not necessary and often should be avoided.评论：代表性通常并非必要，而且往往应予以避免。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1018-22. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt103.
10
Commentary: On representativeness.评论：关于代表性。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1014-5. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt101.
引用本文的文献
1
Interpreting Randomized Controlled Trials.解读随机对照试验
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 22;15(19):4674. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194674.
2
Clarifying the causes of consistent and inconsistent findings in genetics.阐明遗传学中一致和不一致发现的原因。
Genet Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;46(7):372-389. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22459. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
3
On the efficacy of online drug surveys during the time of COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间进行在线药物调查的效果。
Subst Abus. 2020;41(3):283-285. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2020.1784362.
4
Participation, retention, and associated factors of women in a prospective multicenter study on Chlamydia trachomatis infections (FemCure).参与、保留率及其相关因素的女性在一个前瞻性的多中心研究沙眼衣原体感染(FemCure)。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 18;15(3):e0230413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230413. eCollection 2020.
5
Comparison of risk factor associations in UK Biobank against representative, general population based studies with conventional response rates: prospective cohort study and individual participant meta-analysis.在常规应答率的情况下，与具有代表性的、基于一般人群的研究相比，英国生物银行中风险因素相关性的比较：前瞻性队列研究和个体参与者荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Feb 12;368:m131. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m131.
6
The second generation of The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC-G2): a cohort profile.雅芳亲子纵向研究第二代（ALSPAC-G2）：队列简介。
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Feb 20;4:36. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15087.2. eCollection 2019.
7
Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations.碰撞范围：当选择偏差可能对观察到的关联产生实质性影响时。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 1;47(1):226-235. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx206.
8
Moving on From Representativeness: Testing the Utility of the Global Drug Survey.超越代表性：检验全球药物调查的效用。
Subst Abuse. 2017 Jun 30;11:1178221817716391. doi: 10.1177/1178221817716391. eCollection 2017.
9
The Author Responds.作者回应。
Epidemiology. 2017 May;28(3):e32-e33. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000644.
10
Re: Some Thoughts on Consequential Epidemiology and Causal Architecture.关于后果流行病学与因果结构的一些思考
Epidemiology. 2017 May;28(3):e31-e32. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000643.
本文引用的文献
1
Commentary: Should we always deliberately be non-representative?评论：我们是否应该总是刻意地不具代表性？
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1022-6. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt105.
2
Commentary: Representativeness is usually not necessary and often should be avoided.评论：代表性通常并非必要，而且往往应予以避免。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1018-22. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt103.
3
Commentary: Epidemiologists have debated representativeness for more than 40 years--has the time come to move on?评论：40多年来，流行病学家一直在争论代表性问题——现在是不是该向前看了？
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1016-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt102.
4
Commentary: On representativeness.评论：关于代表性。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1014-5. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt101.
5
Why representativeness should be avoided.为何应避免代表性。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1012-4. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys223.
6
Observational studies analyzed like randomized experiments: an application to postmenopausal hormone therapy and coronary heart disease.类似随机试验那样分析的观察性研究：绝经后激素治疗与冠心病的应用
Epidemiology. 2008 Nov;19(6):766-79. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181875e61.
7
Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors.吸烟与死亡率：对英国男性医生50年的观察
BMJ. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE. Epub 2004 Jun 22.
8
Alcohol consumption and mortality among middle-aged and elderly U.S. adults.美国中老年成年人的饮酒情况与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 1997 Dec 11;337(24):1705-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199712113372401.
9
Lung cancer mortality after 16 years in MRFIT participants in intervention and usual-care groups. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.MRFIT研究中干预组和常规护理组参与者16年后的肺癌死亡率。多重危险因素干预试验。
Ann Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;7(2):125-36. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(96)00123-8.
Zotero 插件