Færch Kristine, Pacini Giovanni, Nolan John J, Hansen Torben, Tura Andrea, Vistisen Dorte
Corresponding author: Kristine Færch,
Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov;36(11):3691-7. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0592. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
We studied whether patterns of glucose absorption during oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) were abnormal in individuals with impaired glucose regulation and whether they were related to sex and body size (height and fat-free mass). We also examined how well differences in insulin sensitivity and β-cell function measured by gold-standard tests were reflected in the corresponding OGTT-derived estimates.
With validated methods, various aspects of glucose absorption were estimated from 12-point, 3-h, 75-g OGTTs in 66 individuals with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), isolated impaired fasting glucose (i-IFG), or isolated impaired glucose tolerance (i-IGT). Insulin sensitivity and β-cell function were measured with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp and intravenous glucose tolerance tests, respectively. Surrogate markers of both conditions were calculated from OGTTs.
More rapid glucose absorption (P ≤ 0.036) and reduced late glucose absorption (P ≤ 0.039) were observed in the i-IFG group relative to NGT and i-IGT groups. Women with i-IGT had a lower early glucose absorption than did men with i-IGT (P = 0.041); however, this difference did not persist when differences in body size were taken into account (P > 0.28). Faster glucose absorption was related to higher fasting (P = 0.001) and lower 2-h (P = 0.001) glucose levels and to greater height and fat-free mass (P < 0.001). All OGTT-derived measures of insulin sensitivity, but only one of three measures of β-cell function, reflected the differences for these parameters between those with normal and impaired glucose regulation as measured by gold-standard tests.
Glucose absorption patterns during an OGTT are significantly related to plasma glucose levels and body size, which should be taken into account when estimating β-cell function from OGTTs in epidemiological studies.
我们研究了糖耐量受损个体口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)期间的葡萄糖吸收模式是否异常,以及它们是否与性别和体型(身高和去脂体重)相关。我们还研究了通过金标准试验测量的胰岛素敏感性和β细胞功能差异在相应的OGTT衍生估计值中反映得如何。
采用经过验证的方法,从66例糖耐量正常(NGT)、单纯空腹血糖受损(i-IFG)或单纯糖耐量受损(i-IGT)个体的12点、3小时、75克OGTT中估计葡萄糖吸收的各个方面。分别采用正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹试验和静脉葡萄糖耐量试验测量胰岛素敏感性和β细胞功能。两种情况的替代指标均根据OGTT计算得出。
与NGT组和i-IGT组相比,i-IFG组的葡萄糖吸收更快(P≤0.036),晚期葡萄糖吸收减少(P≤0.039)。i-IGT女性的早期葡萄糖吸收低于i-IGT男性(P = 0.041);然而,考虑到体型差异后,这种差异不再存在(P>0.28)。更快的葡萄糖吸收与更高的空腹血糖(P = 0.001)和更低的2小时血糖水平(P = 0.001)以及更高的身高和去脂体重相关(P<0.001)。所有OGTT衍生的胰岛素敏感性测量指标,但β细胞功能的三个测量指标中只有一个,反映了通过金标准试验测量的正常和受损葡萄糖调节者之间这些参数的差异。
OGTT期间的葡萄糖吸收模式与血浆葡萄糖水平和体型显著相关,在流行病学研究中从OGTT估计β细胞功能时应考虑这一点。