Evans Meredyth, Jason Leonard A
Center for Community Research, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA
Center for Community Research, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Eval Health Prof. 2015 Sep;38(3):367-81. doi: 10.1177/0163278713497014. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
This study serves as an investigation of the reliability of symptom data as reported by individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), across three recall time frames (the past week, the past month, and the past 6 months), and at two assessment points (with 1 week in between each assessment). Multilevel model analyses were used to determine the optimal recall time frame, in terms of test -retest reliability, for each of the Fukuda et al. (1994) case defining symptoms. Results suggested that the optimal time frame for reliably reporting CFS symptoms was six months for sore throat, lymph node pain, muscle pain, post-exertional malaise, headaches, memory/concentration difficulties, and unrefreshing sleep. For joint pain, the optimal time frame was one month. Researchers who are interested in the assessment of CFS symptoms need to take recall time frame into account, especially when the intended goal is to standardize and improve the methods used to reliably and accurately diagnose this complex illness.
本研究旨在调查慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)患者报告的症状数据在三个回忆时间框架(过去一周、过去一个月和过去6个月)以及两个评估点(每次评估间隔1周)的可靠性。采用多水平模型分析来确定福田等人(1994年)定义的每个CFS病例症状在重测信度方面的最佳回忆时间框架。结果表明,可靠报告CFS症状的最佳时间框架,对于喉咙痛、淋巴结疼痛、肌肉疼痛、运动后不适、头痛、记忆/注意力障碍以及睡眠不清醒症状而言是6个月。对于关节疼痛,最佳时间框架是1个月。对CFS症状评估感兴趣的研究人员需要考虑回忆时间框架,特别是当预期目标是标准化并改进用于可靠且准确诊断这种复杂疾病的方法时。