Evans Meredyth, Jason Leonard A
DePaul University.
Cogent Psychol. 2015;2(1). doi: 10.1080/23311908.2015.1079945. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
This study is an investigation of the potential impact of perceived symptom stability on the recall reliability of symptom severity and frequency as reported by individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Symptoms were recalled using three different recall timeframes (the past week, the past month, and the past six months) and at two assessment points (with one week in between each assessment).
Participants were 51 adults (45 women and 6 men), between the ages of 29 and 66 with a current diagnosis of CFS. Multilevel Model (MLM) Analyses were used to determine the optimal recall timeframe (in terms of test-retest reliability) for reporting symptoms perceived as variable and as stable over time.
Headaches were recalled more reliably when they were reported as stable over time. Furthermore, the optimal timeframe in terms of test-retest reliability for stable symptoms was highly uniform, such that all Fukuda CFS symptoms were more reliably recalled at the six month timeframe. Furthermore, the optimal timeframe for CFS symptoms perceived as variable, differed across symptoms.
Symptom stability and recall timeframe are important to consider in order to improve the accuracy and reliability of the current methods for diagnosing this illness.
本研究旨在调查慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)患者所感知的症状稳定性对其报告的症状严重程度和频率的回忆可靠性的潜在影响。使用三种不同的回忆时间框架(过去一周、过去一个月和过去六个月)以及两个评估点(每次评估间隔一周)来回忆症状。
研究对象为51名年龄在29至66岁之间、目前诊断为CFS的成年人(45名女性和6名男性)。采用多水平模型(MLM)分析来确定报告随时间变化和稳定的症状时的最佳回忆时间框架(就重测信度而言)。
当头痛被报告为随时间稳定时,其回忆更为可靠。此外,就稳定症状的重测信度而言,最佳时间框架高度一致,即所有福田CFS症状在六个月时间框架内回忆更为可靠。此外,被视为可变的CFS症状的最佳时间框架因症状而异。
为提高当前该疾病诊断方法的准确性和可靠性,症状稳定性和回忆时间框架是需要考虑的重要因素。