Department of Psychology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT USA ; 32 Campus Dr., Missoula, MT 59812 USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Sep;1(3):372-83. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0055-x.
Research-based queries about patients' experiences often uncover suicidal thoughts. Human subjects review requires suicide risk management (SRM) protocols to protect patients, yet minimal information exists to guide researchers' protocol development and implementation efforts. The purpose of this study was to examine the development and implementation of an SRM protocol employed during telephone-based screening and data collection interviews of depressed primary care patients. We describe an SRM protocol development process and employ qualitative analysis of de-identified documentation to characterize protocol-driven interactions between research clinicians and patients. Protocol development required advance planning, training, and team building. Three percent of screened patients evidenced suicidal ideation; 12% of these met protocol standards for study clinician assessment/intervention. Risk reduction activities required teamwork and extensive collaboration. Research-based SRM protocols can facilitate patient safety by (1) identifying and verifying local clinical site approaches and resources and (2) integrating these features into prevention protocols and training for research teams.
基于研究的患者体验查询常常会揭示出自杀念头。人体研究审查需要自杀风险管理 (SRM) 协议来保护患者,但几乎没有信息可用于指导研究人员制定和实施协议。本研究的目的是检查在基于电话的筛查和抑郁初级保健患者数据收集访谈中使用的 SRM 协议的制定和实施情况。我们描述了一个 SRM 协议开发过程,并采用定性分析非识别身份的文件来描述研究临床医生和患者之间的协议驱动的交互。协议的制定需要提前计划、培训和团队建设。接受筛查的患者中有 3%表现出自杀意念;其中 12%的患者符合研究临床医生评估/干预的协议标准。减少风险的活动需要团队合作和广泛的协作。基于研究的 SRM 协议可以通过以下方式促进患者安全:(1) 识别和验证当地临床场所的方法和资源;(2) 将这些功能整合到预防协议和研究团队的培训中。