• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对转化团队科学的多元化目标、行动逻辑和制度背景的评论。

A commentary on the pluralistic goals, logics of action, and institutional contexts of translational team science.

机构信息

National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Suite 905, Arlington, VA 22230 USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec;2(4):441-5. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0165-0.

DOI:10.1007/s13142-012-0165-0
PMID:24073145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3717931/
Abstract

Teams have emerged as a pivotal form for organizing science efforts. Team goals and issues such as goal alignment are generally considered to be essential to team success. However, given the interdisciplinary and pluralistic goals associated with translational science, team goals become a challenging area for studies that cannot be reconciled without attention to the broader institutional contexts of translational teams. In this commentary, we draw attention to how different goals in team science can be rooted in the broader institutional context and associated logics of action. For the science of team science (SciTS) to impact practice, it is imperative that we be clear about the logic of team goals and their relation to preferred patterns of organizing. We conclude with a reflection on how contextual issues should be at the foreground of SciTS along with the other important issues of team science.

摘要

团队已经成为组织科学工作的关键形式。团队目标和问题,如目标一致性,通常被认为是团队成功的关键。然而,考虑到转化科学所涉及的跨学科和多元化目标,团队目标成为一个具有挑战性的领域,如果不关注转化团队更广泛的机构背景,就无法解决这些目标。在这篇评论中,我们提请注意团队科学中的不同目标如何植根于更广泛的机构背景和相关的行动逻辑。为了使团队科学的科学(SciTS)对实践产生影响,我们必须明确团队目标的逻辑及其与首选组织模式的关系。最后,我们反思了如何将背景问题置于 SciTS 的前沿,以及团队科学的其他重要问题。

相似文献

1
A commentary on the pluralistic goals, logics of action, and institutional contexts of translational team science.对转化团队科学的多元化目标、行动逻辑和制度背景的评论。
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec;2(4):441-5. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0165-0.
2
The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science.团队科学的科学:对科学合作的实证证据和研究差距的综述。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):532-548. doi: 10.1037/amp0000319.
3
Competencies supporting high-performance translational teams: A review of the SciTS evidence base.支持高绩效转化团队的能力:对SciTS证据基础的综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Mar 3;7(1):e62. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.17. eCollection 2023.
4
Measuring the processes of interdisciplinary team collaboration: Creating valid measures using a many-facet Rasch model approach.衡量跨学科团队协作过程:使用多面Rasch模型方法创建有效测量指标。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Oct 6;6(1):e134. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.472. eCollection 2022.
5
What Are Your Goals? Goal-Setting Logics in Danish Parkinson's Rehabilitation.你的目标是什么?丹麦帕金森病康复中的目标设定逻辑。
Med Anthropol. 2022 Aug;41(5):574-590. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2022.2102493. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
6
'What matters to you?' Normative integration of an intervention to promote participation of older patients with multi-morbidity - a qualitative case study.“对你来说什么重要?”促进患有多种疾病的老年患者参与的干预措施的规范整合——一项定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06106-y.
7
Enhancing translational team effectiveness: The Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science framework for translating empirically informed strategies into evidence-based interventions.提高转化团队的效能:威斯康星团队科学干预框架,用于将基于实证的策略转化为循证干预措施。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul 21;5(1):e158. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.825. eCollection 2021.
8
Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science.绘制团队科学学科的研究议程。
Res Eval. 2011 Jun 1;20(2):145-158. doi: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876580.
9
10
Exploring the institutional logics of health professions education scholarship units.探究卫生职业教育学术单位的制度逻辑。
Med Educ. 2017 Jul;51(7):755-767. doi: 10.1111/medu.13334. Epub 2017 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Institutional culture is the key to team science.制度文化是团队科学的关键。
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Dec 8;35(12):1212-1214. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4026.
2
Team science and the physician-scientist in the age of grand health challenges.大健康挑战时代的团队科学与医学科学家
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Sep;1404(1):3-16. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13498.
3
Organizational and training factors that promote team science: A qualitative analysis and application of theory to the National Institutes of Health's BIRCWH career development program.促进团队科学的组织与培训因素:对美国国立卫生研究院BIRCWH职业发展项目的定性分析及理论应用
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Apr;1(2):101-107. doi: 10.1017/cts.2016.17. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
4
Individual motivation and threat indicators of collaboration readiness in scientific knowledge producing teams: a scoping review and domain analysis.科学知识生产团队中合作准备度的个体动机和威胁指标:一项范围综述与领域分析
Heliyon. 2016 May;2(5). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00105.
5
An emerging science and praxis for research and practice teams.一门适用于研究与实践团队的新兴科学及实践方法。
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec;2(4):411-4. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0180-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.提高工作团队的效率。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Dec;7(3):77-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x. Epub 2006 Dec 1.
2
Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science.绘制团队科学学科的研究议程。
Res Eval. 2011 Jun 1;20(2):145-158. doi: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876580.
3
Advancing the science of team science.推进团队科学的科学。
Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Oct;3(5):263-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00223.x.
4
Perspective: teams won't solve this problem.观点:团队无法解决这个问题。
Hum Factors. 2010 Apr;52(2):329-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720810374736.
5
A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science.多层次系统视角的团队科学研究。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Sep 15;2(49):49cm24. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399.
6
The road we must take: multidisciplinary team science.我们必须走的路:多学科团队科学。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Mar 10;2(22):22cm9. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000421.
7
The National Cancer Institute's transdisciplinary centers initiatives and the need for building a science of team science.美国国立癌症研究所的跨学科中心计划以及构建团队科学学科的必要性。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S90-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.012.
8
The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement.团队科学的科学:该领域概述及增刊介绍
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002.
9
Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models.组织中的团队:从输入-过程-输出模型到IMOI模型。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:517-43. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250.