Suppr超能文献

将患者自我管理研究转化为基层医疗:团体医疗访视的挑战与成功。

Translating patient self-management research into primary care: challenges and successes with group medical visits.

机构信息

Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, UC San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, MC0807, La Jolla, CA 92093-0807 USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec;2(4):535-42. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0150-7.

Abstract

Essential to the implementation of a patient-centered medical home is use of evidence-based interventions by a well-coordinated team of providers in a cost-effective manner. Group Medical Visits (GMVs), designed to increase self-management behaviors in patients with chronic illness, have shown inconsistently to be efficacious. Despite the modest results reported thus far in the literature, GMVs have been promoted by the American Academy of Family Physicians as an important component in the patient-centered medical home. This paper describes the challenges of translating GMVs into clinical practice when research support is not available. A review of 5+ years experience in conducting GMVs in clinical practice, including the numerous barriers, is presented through a "three-world view" model utilized by collaborative care leaders. This review is followed by a comparison of variables extracted from patients' electronic health records of those who participated in GMVs to similar patients who did not participate in GMVs. Results suggest that outcomes often reported in efficacy trials are not easily obtained in real clinical practice. Overcoming the operational and financial obstacles to offering GMVs is necessary before they can be promoted as essential elements in a patient-centered medical home.

摘要

以经济有效的方式,由协调良好的医疗团队提供循证干预措施,是实施以患者为中心的医疗之家的基础。设计用于增加慢性病患者自我管理行为的小组医疗访问(GMV),其疗效不一致。尽管迄今为止在文献中报告的结果并不理想,但 GMV 已被美国家庭医生学会推广为以患者为中心的医疗之家的重要组成部分。本文描述了当研究支持不可用时,将 GMV 转化为临床实践所面临的挑战。通过协作护理领导者使用的“三重视角”模型,介绍了在临床实践中开展 GMV 5 年以上的经验,包括许多障碍。接下来,将对参加 GMV 的患者的电子健康记录中的变量与未参加 GMV 的类似患者的变量进行比较。结果表明,在真实的临床实践中,往往难以获得疗效试验中经常报告的结果。在将 GMV 作为以患者为中心的医疗之家的基本要素进行推广之前,必须克服提供 GMV 的运营和财务障碍。

相似文献

2
5
Group Medical Visits and Clinician Wellbeing.团体医疗就诊与临床医生的健康状况
Glob Adv Health Med. 2020 Nov 18;9:2164956120973979. doi: 10.1177/2164956120973979. eCollection 2020.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10

本文引用的文献

3
News from NIH: obesity and diabetes.美国国立卫生研究院的消息:肥胖与糖尿病
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Sep;1(3):365-6. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0061-z.
4
Behavior matters.行为很重要。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5):e15-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.031.
7
Group visits in diabetes care: a systematic review.糖尿病护理中的小组访视:系统评价。
Diabetes Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;36(6):936-44. doi: 10.1177/0145721710385013. Epub 2010 Oct 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验