Imperial College and MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, London, United Kingdom; Patologia e Terapia Intensiva Neonatale, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Dec;26(12):1365-71. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
The echocardiographic assessment of circulatory function in sick newborn infants has the potential to improve patient care. However, measurements are prone to error and have not been sufficiently validated. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides highly validated measures of blood flow and has recently been applied to the newborn population. The aim of this study was to validate measures of left ventricular output and superior vena caval flow volume in newborn infants.
Echocardiographic and MRI assessments were performed within 1 working day of each other in a cohort of newborn infants.
Examinations were performed in 49 infants with a median corrected gestational age at scan of 34.43 weeks (range, 27.43-40 weeks) and a median weight at scan of 1,880 g (range, 660-3,760 g). Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular output showed a strong correlation with MRI assessment (R(2) = 0.83; mean bias, -9.6 mL/kg/min; limits of agreement, -79.6 to +60.0 mL/kg/min; repeatability index, 28.2%). Echocardiographic assessment of superior vena caval flow showed a poor correlation with MRI assessment (R(2) = 0.22; mean bias, -13.7 mL/kg/min; limits of agreement, -89.1 to +61.7 mL/kg/min; repeatability index, 68.0%). Calculating superior vena caval flow volume from an axial area measurement and applying a 50% reduction to stroke distance to compensate for overestimation gave a slightly improved correlation with MRI (R(2) = 0.29; mean bias, 2.6 mL/kg/min; limits of agreement, -53.4 to +58.6 mL/kg/min; repeatability index, 54.5%).
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular output appears relatively robust in newborn infant. Echocardiographic assessment of superior vena caval flow is of limited accuracy in this population, casting doubt on the utility of the measurement for diagnostic decision making.
超声心动图评估患病新生儿的循环功能有可能改善患者的护理。然而,这些测量结果容易出错,并且尚未得到充分验证。相位对比磁共振成像(MRI)可提供高度验证的血流测量值,并已应用于新生儿人群。本研究的目的是验证新生儿左心室输出量和上腔静脉血流量的测量值。
在一组新生儿中,在彼此相距 1 个工作日内进行超声心动图和 MRI 评估。
对 49 名校正胎龄在扫描时中位数为 34.43 周(范围为 27.43-40 周)且扫描时中位数体重为 1880g(范围为 660-3760g)的新生儿进行了检查。左心室输出量的超声心动图评估与 MRI 评估具有很强的相关性(R²=0.83;平均偏差,-9.6mL/kg/min;一致性界限,-79.6 至+60.0mL/kg/min;重复性指数,28.2%)。上腔静脉血流的超声心动图评估与 MRI 评估相关性较差(R²=0.22;平均偏差,-13.7mL/kg/min;一致性界限,-89.1 至+61.7mL/kg/min;重复性指数,68.0%)。通过对轴向面积进行测量并应用 50%的stroke distance 减少来补偿高估,计算上腔静脉血流量可略微提高与 MRI 的相关性(R²=0.29;平均偏差,2.6mL/kg/min;一致性界限,-53.4 至+58.6mL/kg/min;重复性指数,54.5%)。
超声心动图评估新生儿的左心室输出量似乎相对可靠。在该人群中,上腔静脉血流的超声心动图评估准确性有限,这对该测量值用于诊断决策产生了怀疑。