Kondo William, Ribeiro Reitan, Zomer Monica Tessmann
Department of Gynecology, Sugisawa Medical Center, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil; Department of Gynecology, Vita Batel Hospital, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Department of Gynecology, Vita Batel Hospital, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):285-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
To evaluate the length of hospital stay (LOS) and the readmission rate in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery to treat intestinal deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) with application of the concepts of fast-track surgery.
Retrospective study of women undergoing laparoscopic treatment of intestinal DIE (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
Tertiary referral private hospital.
We evaluated 161 women who underwent laparoscopic surgery between January 2010 and April 2013 for complete treatment of intestinal DIE, via either conservative surgery (rectal shaving, mucosal skinning, or anterior disk resection) or radical surgery (segmental bowel resection). After surgery, all specimens were sent for pathologic examination to confirm the presence of endometriosis.
Patients were divided into 2 groups according to type of surgery (conservative [n = 102] or radical [n = 59]), and LOS and readmission rate were measured in both groups. Median LOS was shorter in the conservative group compared with the segmental bowel resection group (19 vs 28 hours; p < .001). Ninety-two patients (90.2%) in the conservative surgery group were discharged to home on the first postoperative day, compared with only 38 patients (64.4%) in the segmental bowel resection group. Overall, the readmission rate was low (3.1%): 6.8% in the segmental bowel resection group and 1% in the conservative group (p = .04; odds ratio, 7.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-67.3); however, the need for repeat operation was similar in both groups (3.4% vs 1%; p = .28; odds ratio, 3.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-39.95).
Implementation of fast-track concepts in the laparoscopic treatment of intestinal DIE resulted in a short LOS and low readmission rate in both the segmental bowel resection and conservative surgery groups.
应用快速康复外科理念,评估接受腹腔镜手术治疗肠道深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症(DIE)患者的住院时间(LOS)和再入院率。
对接受腹腔镜治疗肠道DIE(加拿大工作组分类II - 3)的女性进行回顾性研究。
三级转诊私立医院。
我们评估了2010年1月至2013年4月间接受腹腔镜手术以彻底治疗肠道DIE的161名女性,手术方式包括保守手术(直肠剃除术、黏膜剥脱术或前盘切除术)或根治性手术(节段性肠切除术)。术后,所有标本均送病理检查以确诊子宫内膜异位症。
根据手术类型(保守手术[n = 102]或根治性手术[n = 59])将患者分为两组,并测量两组的住院时间和再入院率。保守手术组的中位住院时间短于节段性肠切除术组(分别为19小时和28小时;p <.001)。保守手术组92例患者(90.2%)术后第一天出院回家,而节段性肠切除术组仅38例患者(64.4%)。总体而言,再入院率较低(3.1%):节段性肠切除术组为6.8%,保守手术组为1%(p =.04;优势比,7.34;95%置信区间,0.8 - 67.3);然而,两组再次手术的需求相似(3.4%对1%;p =.28;优势比,3.54;95%置信区间,0.31 - 39.95)。
在腹腔镜治疗肠道DIE中实施快速康复理念,使节段性肠切除术组和保守手术组的住院时间均缩短,再入院率降低。