Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 10;62(23):2244-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.099. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
This study sought to develop quality indicators (QIs) for outpatient management of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients.
There are no published QIs to promote quality measurement and improvement for ACHD patients.
Working groups of ACHD experts reviewed published data and United States, Canadian, and European guidelines to identify candidate QIs. For each QI, we specified a numerator, denominator, period of assessment, and data source. We submitted the QIs to a 9-member panel of international ACHD experts. The panel rated the QIs for validity and feasibility in 2 rounds on a scale of 1 to 9 using the RAND/University of California-Los Angeles modified-Delphi method, and final QI selection was on the basis of median scores.
A total of 62 QIs were identified regarding appropriateness and timing of clinical management, testing, and test interpretation. Each QI was ascertainable from health records. After the first round of rating, 29 QIs were accepted, none were rejected, and 33 were equivocal; on the second round, 55 QIs were accepted. Final QIs included: 8 for atrial septal defects; 9 for aortic coarctation; 12 for Eisenmenger; 9 for Fontan; 9 for D-transposition of the great arteries; and 8 for tetralogy of Fallot.
This project resulted in development of the first set of QIs for ACHD care based on published data, guidelines, and a modified Delphi process. These QIs provide a quality of care assessment tool for 6 ACHD conditions. This rigorously designed set of QIs should facilitate measuring and improving the quality of care for this growing group of patients.
本研究旨在为成人先天性心脏病(ACHD)患者的门诊管理制定质量指标(QIs)。
目前尚无发表的 QI 用于促进 ACHD 患者的质量衡量和改进。
ACHD 专家工作组审查了已发表的数据以及美国、加拿大和欧洲的指南,以确定候选 QI。对于每个 QI,我们都指定了分子、分母、评估期限和数据源。我们将 QI 提交给由 9 名国际 ACHD 专家组成的小组。该小组使用 RAND/加州大学洛杉矶分校改良德尔菲法在 1 到 9 的范围内对 QI 的有效性和可行性进行了两轮评分,最终的 QI 选择是基于中位数评分。
共确定了 62 个关于临床管理、检测和检测解释的适当性和时机的 QI。每个 QI 都可以从健康记录中确定。在第一轮评分后,接受了 29 个 QI,没有被拒绝,33 个被认为是不确定的;在第二轮评分中,接受了 55 个 QI。最终的 QI 包括:8 个房间隔缺损;9 个主动脉缩窄;12 个艾森曼格;9 个 Fontan;9 个大动脉转位;和 8 个法洛四联症。
该项目基于已发表的数据、指南和改良德尔菲法制定了第一批 ACHD 护理的 QI。这些 QI 为 6 种 ACHD 疾病提供了一种护理质量评估工具。这套经过严格设计的 QI 应该有助于衡量和改善这一不断增长的患者群体的护理质量。