Suppr超能文献

组学数据标准的海洋:沉或浮?

A sea of standards for omics data: sink or swim?

机构信息

Duke Translational Medicine Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):200-3. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002066. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

Abstract

In the era of Big Data, omic-scale technologies, and increasing calls for data sharing, it is generally agreed that the use of community-developed, open data standards is critical. Far less agreed upon is exactly which data standards should be used, the criteria by which one should choose a standard, or even what constitutes a data standard. It is impossible simply to choose a domain and have it naturally follow which data standards should be used in all cases. The 'right' standards to use is often dependent on the use case scenarios for a given project. Potential downstream applications for the data, however, may not always be apparent at the time the data are generated. Similarly, technology evolves, adding further complexity. Would-be standards adopters must strike a balance between planning for the future and minimizing the burden of compliance. Better tools and resources are required to help guide this balancing act.

摘要

在大数据时代、组学规模技术以及对数据共享的呼声日益高涨的背景下,人们普遍认为,使用社区开发的、开放的数据标准至关重要。但人们远未就应使用哪些数据标准、选择标准的标准,甚至什么构成数据标准达成一致意见。简单地选择一个领域,并认为在所有情况下都应该使用哪些数据标准是不可能的。在给定项目中使用“正确”的标准通常取决于用例场景。然而,数据的潜在下游应用在生成数据时并不总是显而易见的。同样,技术也在不断发展,增加了更多的复杂性。潜在的标准采用者必须在规划未来和最小化合规负担之间取得平衡。需要更好的工具和资源来帮助指导这种平衡行为。

相似文献

1
A sea of standards for omics data: sink or swim?组学数据标准的海洋:沉或浮?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):200-3. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002066. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
2
Fostering responsible data sharing through standards.通过标准促进负责任的数据共享。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 5;370(23):2163-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1401444.
6
7
Computational ontologies in orthopaedic surgery.骨科手术中的计算本体论。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Oct;468(10):2612-20. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1382-9.

引用本文的文献

7
Embracing Transparency Through Data Sharing.通过数据共享实现透明度。
Int J Toxicol. 2018 Nov/Dec;37(6):466-471. doi: 10.1177/1091581818803880. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Geneticists push for global data-sharing.遗传学家推动全球数据共享。
Nature. 2013 Jun 6;498(7452):16-7. doi: 10.1038/498017a.
3
Peering into peer-review at GigaScience.GigaScience 同行评审探秘
Gigascience. 2013 Jan 24;2(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-2-1.
5
Life sciences domain analysis model.生命科学领域分析模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Nov-Dec;19(6):1095-102. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000763. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
6
Toward interoperable bioscience data.迈向可互操作的生物科学数据
Nat Genet. 2012 Jan 27;44(2):121-6. doi: 10.1038/ng.1054.
9
Megascience. 'Omics data sharing.大科学。“组学”数据共享。
Science. 2009 Oct 9;326(5950):234-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1180598.
10
Data's shameful neglect.数据被可耻地忽视了。
Nature. 2009 Sep 10;461(7261):145. doi: 10.1038/461145a.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验