Mol Biol Rep. 2013 Nov;40(11):6143-50. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2725-x.
Docetaxel (Doc) and adriamycin (Adr) are two of the most effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of breast cancer. However, their efficacy is often limited by the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR). The purpose of this study was to investigate MDR mechanisms through analyzing systematically the expression changes of genes related to MDR in the induction process of isogenic drug resistant MCF-7 cell lines. Isogenic resistant sublines selected at 100 and 200 nM Doc (MCF-7/100 nM Doc and MCF-7/200 nM Doc) or at 500 and 1,500 nM Adr (MCF-7/500 nM Adr and MCF-7/1,500 nM) were developed from human breast cancer parental cell line MCF-7, by exposing MCF-7 to gradually increasing concentrations of Doc or Adr in vitro. Cell growth curve, flow cytometry and MTT cytotoxicity assay were preformed to evaluate the MDR characteristics developed in the sublines. Some key genes on the pathways related to drug resistance (including drug-transporters: MDR1, MRP1 and BCRP; drug metabolizing-enzymes: CYP3A4 and glutathione S-transferases (GST) pi; target genes: topoisomerase II (TopoIIα) and Tubb3; apoptosis genes: Bcl-2 and Bax) were analyzed at RNA and protein expression levels by real time RT-qPCR and western blot, respectively. Compared to MCF-7/S (30.6 h), cell doubling time of MCF-7/Doc (41.6 h) and MCF-7/Adr (33.8 h) were both prolonged, and the cell proportion of resistant sublines in G1/G2 phase increased while that in S-phase decreased. MCF-7/100 nM Doc and MCF-7/200 nM Doc was 22- and 37-fold resistant to Doc, 18- and 32-fold to Adr, respectively. MCF-7/500 nM Adr and MCF-7/1,500 nM Adr was 61- and 274-fold resistant to Adr, three and 12-fold to Doc, respectively. Meantime, they also showed cross-resistance to the other anticancer drugs in different degrees. Compared to MCF-7/S, RT-qPCR and Western blot results revealed that the expression of MDR1, MRP1, BCRP, Tubb3 and Bcl-2 were elevated in both MCF-7/Doc and MCF-7/Adr, and TopoIIα, Bax were down-regulated in both the sublines, while CYP3A4, GST pi were increased only in MCF-7/Doc and MCF-7/Adr respectively. Furthermore, the changes above were dose-dependent. The established MCF-7/Doc or MCF-7/Adr has the typical MDR characteristics, which can be used as the models for resistance mechanism study. The acquired process of MCF-7/S resistance to Doc or Adr is gradual, and is complicated with the various pathways involved in. There are some common resistant mechanisms as well as own drug-specific changes between both the sublines.
多西紫杉醇(Doc)和阿霉素(Adr)是治疗乳腺癌最有效的两种化疗药物。然而,它们的疗效常常受到多药耐药(MDR)的出现所限制。本研究旨在通过系统分析同源耐药 MCF-7 细胞系诱导过程中与 MDR 相关基因的表达变化,研究 MDR 机制。通过在体外逐渐增加 Doc 或 Adr 的浓度,从人乳腺癌亲本细胞系 MCF-7 中筛选出对 100 nM Doc(MCF-7/100 nM Doc 和 MCF-7/200 nM Doc)或 500 nM Adr(MCF-7/500 nM Adr 和 MCF-7/1,500 nM Adr)的同源耐药亚系。通过细胞生长曲线、流式细胞术和 MTT 细胞毒性测定评估亚系中产生的 MDR 特征。采用实时 RT-qPCR 和 Western blot 分别分析与耐药相关的途径(包括药物转运蛋白:MDR1、MRP1 和 BCRP;药物代谢酶:CYP3A4 和谷胱甘肽 S-转移酶(GST)pi;靶基因:拓扑异构酶 II(TopoIIα)和 Tubb3;凋亡基因:Bcl-2 和 Bax)上的一些关键基因的 RNA 和蛋白质表达水平。与 MCF-7/S(30.6 h)相比,MCF-7/Doc(41.6 h)和 MCF-7/Adr(33.8 h)的细胞倍增时间均延长,耐药亚系 G1/G2 期细胞比例增加,而 S 期细胞比例减少。MCF-7/100 nM Doc 和 MCF-7/200 nM Doc 对 Doc 的耐药性分别提高了 22 倍和 37 倍,对 Adr 的耐药性分别提高了 18 倍和 32 倍。MCF-7/500 nM Adr 和 MCF-7/1,500 nM Adr 对 Adr 的耐药性分别提高了 61 倍和 274 倍,对 Doc 的耐药性分别提高了 3 倍和 12 倍。同时,它们对其他不同程度的抗癌药物也表现出交叉耐药性。与 MCF-7/S 相比,RT-qPCR 和 Western blot 结果显示,MCF-7/Doc 和 MCF-7/Adr 中 MDR1、MRP1、BCRP、Tubb3 和 Bcl-2 的表达均升高,而两个亚系中的 TopoIIα、Bax 均下调,而 CYP3A4、GST pi 仅在 MCF-7/Doc 和 MCF-7/Adr 中分别增加。此外,这些变化是剂量依赖性的。建立的 MCF-7/Doc 或 MCF-7/Adr 具有典型的 MDR 特征,可作为耐药机制研究的模型。MCF-7/S 对 Doc 或 Adr 的耐药性获得过程是逐渐的,涉及多种途径。两个亚系之间既有一些共同的耐药机制,也有各自药物特异性的变化。