Adibi Peyman, Enjavian Mohammad, Alizadeh Reza, Omid Athar
Department of Medicine, Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, ICU, Iran.
J Educ Health Promot. 2013 Jul 31;2:35. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.115824. eCollection 2013.
Holding bedside round teaching and involving patients in the teaching of the students might lead to patients' dissatisfaction. This study was carried out in order to find the viewpoints of the patients and the medical team about the effect of clinical round on patients hospitalized in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
This study is of cross-sectional descriptive type which is carried out in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences using researcher-made tools. The statistical population included the hospitalized patients, interns, residents, and nurses of the internal wards of educational hospitals. In this study, 110 patients and 150 health team staff are participated. The analysis of the data was done through software Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 11.5 and descriptive and inferential statistics were applied. Statistical analysis of the variance did not show any significant difference among the interns', nurses', and residents' perception of patient's satisfaction.
Generally, the patients had a positive viewpoint toward things happening during a round, whereas the medical team's viewpoint was negative. In both groups, the highest satisfaction average pertained to the number of times and the duration of visits, but both groups believed that lack of a definite responsible medical doctor, feeling of insecurity during the incongruous and unclear discussions, and the level of respect for the patient were the causes of dissatisfaction with the clinical round process.
The current method of clinical rounds can result in patients' dissatisfaction. On the other hand, proper relationship with them leads to the development of a more positive attitude in them. Therefore, revision and correction of the current clinical round procedures and teaching the communication skills to the medical team could help improve this process.
进行床边查房教学并让患者参与学生教学可能会导致患者不满。本研究旨在了解患者和医疗团队对伊斯法罕医科大学住院患者临床查房效果的看法。
本研究为横断面描述性研究,使用研究者自制工具在伊斯法罕医科大学开展。统计总体包括教学医院内科病房的住院患者、实习生、住院医师和护士。本研究共纳入110名患者和150名医疗团队工作人员。数据通过社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)11.5进行分析,并应用描述性和推断性统计方法。方差统计分析显示,实习生、护士和住院医师对患者满意度的认知之间没有显著差异。
总体而言,患者对查房期间发生的事情持积极看法,而医疗团队的看法则是否定的。在两组中,满意度平均值最高的方面是查房次数和时长,但两组都认为缺乏明确的责任医生、在不协调和不清晰的讨论中感到不安全以及对患者的尊重程度是对临床查房过程不满的原因。
当前的临床查房方式可能导致患者不满。另一方面,与他们建立良好关系会使他们产生更积极的态度。因此,修订和纠正当前的临床查房程序并对医疗团队进行沟通技巧培训有助于改善这一过程。