Suppr超能文献

贝德福德阿尔茨海默病护理严重程度量表评估晚期痴呆患者的痴呆严重程度:非参数项目反应分析及其心理测量学特征研究。

The Bedford Alzheimer nursing-severity scale to assess dementia severity in advanced dementia: a nonparametric item response analysis and a study of its psychometric characteristics.

机构信息

1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2014 Feb;29(1):84-9. doi: 10.1177/1533317513506777. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

Abstract

The Bedford Alzheimer Nursing-Severity Scale (BANS-S) assesses disease severity in patients with advanced Alzheimer's disease. Since Alzheimer is a progressive disease, studying the hierarchy of the items in the scale can be useful to evaluate the progression of the disease. Data from 164 Alzheimer's patients and 186 patients with other dementia were analyzed using the Mokken Scaling Methodology to determine whether respondents can be ordered in the trait dementia severity, and to study whether an ordering between the items exist. The scalability of the scale was evaluated by the H coefficient. Results showed that the BANS-S is a reliable and medium scale (0.4≤H<0.5) for the Alzheimer group. All items with the exception of the item about mobility could be ordered. When later item was eliminated from the scale, the H coefficient decreased indicating that the scalability of the scale in the original form is more accurate than in the shorter version. For the other dementia group, the BANS-S did not fit any of the Mokken Scaling models because the scale was not unidimensional. In this group, a shorter version of the scale without the sleeping cycle item and the mobility item has better reliability and scalability properties than the original scale.

摘要

贝德福德阿尔茨海默病护理严重程度量表(BANS-S)评估晚期阿尔茨海默病患者的疾病严重程度。由于阿尔茨海默病是一种进行性疾病,研究量表中项目的层次结构对于评估疾病的进展可能是有用的。使用 Mokken 尺度分析法对 164 名阿尔茨海默病患者和 186 名其他痴呆症患者的数据进行了分析,以确定是否可以按照特质性痴呆严重程度对回答者进行排序,并研究项目之间是否存在排序关系。通过 H 系数评估量表的可度量性。结果表明,BANS-S 是一个可靠的中等规模量表(0.4≤H<0.5),适用于阿尔茨海默病组。除了关于活动能力的项目外,所有项目都可以进行排序。当从量表中删除后续项目时,H 系数降低,表明原始形式量表的可度量性比缩短版本更准确。对于其他痴呆症组,BANS-S 不符合任何 Mokken 尺度模型,因为量表不是单维的。在该组中,不包括睡眠周期项目和活动能力项目的较短版本的量表具有比原始量表更好的可靠性和可度量性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Speech and orofacial apraxias in Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病中的言语和口颜面失用症。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Oct;25(10):1679-85. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000781. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
7
Item response theory: how Mokken scaling can be used in clinical practice.项目反应理论:莫克肯标定法如何应用于临床实践。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Oct;21(19-20):2736-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03893.x. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
10
The clinical course of advanced dementia.晚期痴呆的临床病程。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 15;361(16):1529-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902234.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验