Suppr超能文献

UKPDS 风险引擎在新诊断 2 型糖尿病中的外部验证:需要新的 2 型糖尿病特异性风险方程。

External validation of the UKPDS risk engine in incident type 2 diabetes: a need for new type 2 diabetes-specific risk equations.

机构信息

Corresponding author: Craig J. Currie,

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2014 Feb;37(2):537-45. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1159. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine (UKPDS-RE) for predicting the 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease end points in an independent cohort of U.K. patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using routine health care data collected between April 1998 and October 2011 from ∼350 U.K. primary care practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Participants comprised 79,966 patients aged between 35 and 85 years (388,269 person-years) with 4,984 cardiovascular events. Four outcomes were evaluated: first diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, fatal CHD, and fatal stroke.

RESULTS

Accounting for censoring, the observed versus predicted 10-year event rates were as follows: CHD 6.1 vs. 16.5%, fatal CHD 1.9 vs. 10.1%, stroke 7.0 vs. 10.1%, and fatal stroke 1.7 vs. 1.6%, respectively. The UKPDS-RE showed moderate discrimination for all four outcomes, with the concordance index values ranging from 0.65 to 0.78.

CONCLUSIONS

The UKPDS stroke equations showed calibration ranging from poor to moderate; however, the CHD equations showed poor calibration and considerably overestimated CHD risk. There is a need for revised risk equations in type 2 diabetes.

摘要

目的

评估英国前瞻性糖尿病研究风险引擎(UKPDS-RE)在预测英国新诊断为 2 型糖尿病患者 10 年心血管疾病终点风险方面的性能。

研究设计和方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用 1998 年 4 月至 2011 年 10 月期间从参与临床实践研究数据链接(CPRD)的约 350 家英国初级保健机构收集的常规医疗保健数据。参与者包括年龄在 35 至 85 岁之间的 79966 名患者(388269 人年),其中有 4984 例心血管事件。评估了以下四个结局:首次诊断为冠心病(CHD)、中风、致命性 CHD 和致命性中风。

结果

考虑到删失,观察到的与预测的 10 年事件发生率如下:CHD 为 6.1%比 16.5%,致命性 CHD 为 1.9%比 10.1%,中风为 7.0%比 10.1%,致命性中风为 1.7%比 1.6%。UKPDS-RE 对所有四个结局均显示出中度区分能力,一致性指数值范围在 0.65 至 0.78 之间。

结论

UKPDS 中风方程的校准范围从差到中等;然而,CHD 方程的校准较差,并且大大高估了 CHD 风险。2 型糖尿病需要修订的风险方程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验