• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据SLIC评分治疗的下颈椎创伤患者的临床结果。

Clinical results of patients with subaxial cervical spine trauma treated according to the SLIC score.

作者信息

Joaquim Andrei F, Ghizoni Enrico, Tedeschi Helder, da Cruz Halisson Y F, Patel Alpesh A

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Jul;37(4):420-4. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000143. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000143
PMID:24090539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4116726/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) system has been developed to improve injury classification and guide surgical decision making yet clinical validation remains necessary.

METHODS

We evaluated the validity and safety of the SLIC system prospectively in patients treated for subaxial cervical spine trauma (SCST) between 2009 and 2012. Patients with four or more points were surgically treated, whereas patients with less than 4 points were conservatively managed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Neurological status was assessed as the primary outcome of successful treatment.

RESULTS

Non-surgical group - Twenty-three patients were treated non-surgically, 14 (61%) of them with some follow-up at our institution. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 5 months (mean of 4.42; median 4). The SLIC score ranged from 0 to 6 points (mean and median of 1). One patient with a SLIC of 6 points refused surgery. Surgical group: Twenty-five patients were operated, but follow-up after hospital discharge was obtained in 23 (92%) patients (range from 1 to 24 months, mean of 5.82 months). The SLIC score in this group ranged from 4 to 9 points (mean and median of 7). No patients had neurological worsening. Eight of 13 patients with incomplete deficits had some improvement in American Spinal Injury Association score.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective application of the SLIC system. With regard to our primary outcome, neurological status, the SLIC system was found to be a safe and effective guide in the surgical treatment of SCST.

摘要

目的

亚轴损伤分类(SLIC)系统已被开发出来以改进损伤分类并指导手术决策,但仍需要临床验证。

方法

我们前瞻性地评估了2009年至2012年间接受亚轴颈椎创伤(SCST)治疗的患者中SLIC系统的有效性和安全性。得分4分及以上的患者接受手术治疗,而得分低于4分的患者则采取保守治疗。

结果指标

将神经状态评估为成功治疗的主要结果。

结果

非手术组——23例患者接受了非手术治疗,其中14例(61%)在我们机构进行了一些随访。随访时间为3至5个月(平均4.42个月;中位数4个月)。SLIC评分范围为0至6分(平均和中位数为1分)。1例SLIC评分为6分的患者拒绝手术。手术组:25例患者接受了手术,但23例(92%)患者出院后获得了随访(范围为1至24个月,平均5.82个月)。该组的SLIC评分范围为4至9分(平均和中位数为7分)。没有患者出现神经功能恶化。13例不完全性神经功能缺损患者中有8例美国脊髓损伤协会评分有所改善。

结论

这是SLIC系统的首次前瞻性应用。就我们的主要结果神经状态而言,SLIC系统被发现是SCST手术治疗的安全有效指南。

相似文献

1
Clinical results of patients with subaxial cervical spine trauma treated according to the SLIC score.根据SLIC评分治疗的下颈椎创伤患者的临床结果。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Jul;37(4):420-4. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000143. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
2
Parsing the Utility of CT and MRI in the Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification (SLIC) System: Is CT SLIC Enough?剖析CT和MRI在下颈椎损伤分类(SLIC)系统中的效用:CT SLIC是否足够?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jun;206(6):1292-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15492. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
3
Validation of the Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification score in children: a single-institution experience at a level 1 pediatric trauma center.下颈椎损伤分类评分在儿童中的验证:1 级儿童创伤中心的单机构经验。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2024 Jul 5;34(4):365-372. doi: 10.3171/2024.4.PEDS24102. Print 2024 Oct 1.
4
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the newer AOSpine subaxial cervical injury classification (C-3 to C-7).新型AOSpine下颈椎损伤分类(C3至C7)的可靠性和有效性评估。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Sep;25(3):303-8. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE151039. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
5
Subaxial injury classification scoring system treatment recommendations: external agreement study based on retrospective review of 185 patients.下颈椎损伤分类评分系统治疗建议:基于185例患者回顾性分析的外部一致性研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 1;40(3):137-42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000666.
6
Subaxial cervical spine trauma classification: the Subaxial Injury Classification system and case examples.下颈椎创伤分类:下颈椎损伤分类系统及病例示例。
Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25(5):E8. doi: 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.11.E8.
7
Evaluation of the subaxial injury classification system.下颈椎损伤分类系统的评估
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2011 Jul;2(2):67-72. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.100057.
8
The Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System: an external agreement validation study.下颈椎损伤分类系统:一项外部一致性验证研究。
Spine J. 2013 Sep;13(9):1055-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.040. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
9
Comparative effectiveness of surgical versus nonoperative management of unilateral, nondisplaced, subaxial cervical spine facet fractures without evidence of spinal cord injury: clinical article.单侧、无移位、颈椎关节突骨折且无脊髓损伤的手术与非手术治疗的疗效比较:临床研究文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Mar;20(3):270-7. doi: 10.3171/2013.11.SPINE13733. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
10
The development and evaluation of the subaxial injury classification scoring system for cervical spine trauma.下颈椎创伤分类评分系统的研制与评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar;469(3):723-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1576-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Classification in Brief: Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification and Severity Score System.简要分类:下颈椎损伤分类与严重程度评分系统。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2390-2398. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001463.
2
Fluoroscopy-assisted posterior percutaneous reduction for the management of unilateral cervical facet dislocations after unsuccessful closed reduction: A case report.透视辅助下经皮后路复位治疗闭合复位失败后的单侧颈椎小关节脱位:一例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;58:212-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.04.038. Epub 2019 May 3.
3
The role of pre-reduction MRI in the management of complex cervical spine fracture-dislocations: an ongoing controversy?复位前磁共振成像在复杂颈椎骨折脱位治疗中的作用:这是一个仍在持续的争议吗?
Patient Saf Surg. 2017 Sep 8;11:23. doi: 10.1186/s13037-017-0139-8. eCollection 2017.
4
Cervical injuries scored according to the Subaxial Injury Classification system: An analysis of the literature.根据下颈椎损伤分类系统对颈椎损伤进行评分:文献分析
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2014 Apr;5(2):65-70. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.139200.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the subaxial injury classification system.下颈椎损伤分类系统的评估
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2011 Jul;2(2):67-72. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.100057.
2
The epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in British Columbia, Canada.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省外伤性脊髓损伤的流行病学。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Feb 15;37(4):321-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822e5ff8.
3
Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Tianjin, China.中国天津外伤性脊髓损伤的流行病学。
Spinal Cord. 2011 Mar;49(3):386-90. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.130. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
4
The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex.下颈椎损伤分类系统:一种认识椎间盘韧带复合体形态、神经学及完整性重要性的新方法。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 1;32(21):2365-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557b92.
5
International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2003 Spring;26 Suppl 1:S50-6. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2003.11754575.
6
Traumatic central cord syndrome: results of surgical management.创伤性中央脊髓综合征:手术治疗结果
J Neurosurg. 2002 Jul;97(1 Suppl):25-32. doi: 10.3171/spi.2002.97.1.0025.
7
The Sygen multicenter acute spinal cord injury study.西根多中心急性脊髓损伤研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 15;26(24 Suppl):S87-98. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00015.
8
The role of decompression for acute incomplete cervical spinal cord injury in cervical spondylosis.减压在颈椎病所致急性不完全性颈脊髓损伤中的作用
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Nov 15;23(22):2398-403. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199811150-00007.
9
Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial. National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study.甲基强的松龙治疗24或48小时或甲磺替拉扎特治疗48小时用于急性脊髓损伤的治疗。第三次全国急性脊髓损伤随机对照试验的结果。全国急性脊髓损伤研究。
JAMA. 1997 May 28;277(20):1597-604.
10
A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study.一项关于甲基泼尼松龙或纳洛酮治疗急性脊髓损伤的随机对照试验。第二次全国急性脊髓损伤研究结果。
N Engl J Med. 1990 May 17;322(20):1405-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199005173222001.