Suppr超能文献

根据SLIC评分治疗的下颈椎创伤患者的临床结果。

Clinical results of patients with subaxial cervical spine trauma treated according to the SLIC score.

作者信息

Joaquim Andrei F, Ghizoni Enrico, Tedeschi Helder, da Cruz Halisson Y F, Patel Alpesh A

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Jul;37(4):420-4. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000143. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) system has been developed to improve injury classification and guide surgical decision making yet clinical validation remains necessary.

METHODS

We evaluated the validity and safety of the SLIC system prospectively in patients treated for subaxial cervical spine trauma (SCST) between 2009 and 2012. Patients with four or more points were surgically treated, whereas patients with less than 4 points were conservatively managed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Neurological status was assessed as the primary outcome of successful treatment.

RESULTS

Non-surgical group - Twenty-three patients were treated non-surgically, 14 (61%) of them with some follow-up at our institution. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 5 months (mean of 4.42; median 4). The SLIC score ranged from 0 to 6 points (mean and median of 1). One patient with a SLIC of 6 points refused surgery. Surgical group: Twenty-five patients were operated, but follow-up after hospital discharge was obtained in 23 (92%) patients (range from 1 to 24 months, mean of 5.82 months). The SLIC score in this group ranged from 4 to 9 points (mean and median of 7). No patients had neurological worsening. Eight of 13 patients with incomplete deficits had some improvement in American Spinal Injury Association score.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective application of the SLIC system. With regard to our primary outcome, neurological status, the SLIC system was found to be a safe and effective guide in the surgical treatment of SCST.

摘要

目的

亚轴损伤分类(SLIC)系统已被开发出来以改进损伤分类并指导手术决策,但仍需要临床验证。

方法

我们前瞻性地评估了2009年至2012年间接受亚轴颈椎创伤(SCST)治疗的患者中SLIC系统的有效性和安全性。得分4分及以上的患者接受手术治疗,而得分低于4分的患者则采取保守治疗。

结果指标

将神经状态评估为成功治疗的主要结果。

结果

非手术组——23例患者接受了非手术治疗,其中14例(61%)在我们机构进行了一些随访。随访时间为3至5个月(平均4.42个月;中位数4个月)。SLIC评分范围为0至6分(平均和中位数为1分)。1例SLIC评分为6分的患者拒绝手术。手术组:25例患者接受了手术,但23例(92%)患者出院后获得了随访(范围为1至24个月,平均5.82个月)。该组的SLIC评分范围为4至9分(平均和中位数为7分)。没有患者出现神经功能恶化。13例不完全性神经功能缺损患者中有8例美国脊髓损伤协会评分有所改善。

结论

这是SLIC系统的首次前瞻性应用。就我们的主要结果神经状态而言,SLIC系统被发现是SCST手术治疗的安全有效指南。

相似文献

7
Evaluation of the subaxial injury classification system.下颈椎损伤分类系统的评估
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2011 Jul;2(2):67-72. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.100057.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the subaxial injury classification system.下颈椎损伤分类系统的评估
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2011 Jul;2(2):67-72. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.100057.
3
Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Tianjin, China.中国天津外伤性脊髓损伤的流行病学。
Spinal Cord. 2011 Mar;49(3):386-90. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.130. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
5
International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2003 Spring;26 Suppl 1:S50-6. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2003.11754575.
7
The Sygen multicenter acute spinal cord injury study.西根多中心急性脊髓损伤研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 15;26(24 Suppl):S87-98. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00015.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验