Kawaguchi Yoshiharu, Nakano Masato, Yasuda Taketoshi, Seki Shoji, Hori Takeshi, Kimura Tomoatsu
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):955-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.457. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
Two surgical procedures, posterior decompressive surgery (PDS) and anterior decompressive surgery (ADS), are the treatment options for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Each procedure has advantages and disadvantages. Cervical laminoplasty, a type of PDS, is relatively easy to perform and can be used for patients with multilevel cord compression. ADS can often be more technically demanding.
The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical characteristics and surgical results of the patients for whom ADS was necessary after PDS.
Retrospective study.
A total of 144 patients, followed for more than 3 years after cervical laminoplasty, were included. The neurologic status was graded using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA score). Eleven patients underwent ADS after PDS. The clinical background and surgical outcomes were evaluated. Radiological findings of the 11 patients requiring ADS after PDS (PA group) and the 133 PDS patients not requiring ADS (P group) were compared.
In the PA group, the JOA score was slightly deteriorated during follow-up after cervical laminoplasty. Severe pain in the unilateral upper extremity and deterioration of cervical myelopathy were the most typical symptoms necessitating ADS. The incidence of the mixed type of OPLL was significantly higher in this group. The JOA score improved in all patients after ADS as a second surgery.
In our strategy for the surgical treatment of cervical OPLL, PDS with laminoplasty remains as the initial treatment, and in patients with neurological deterioration and newly developed clinical symptoms during follow-up, ADS is considered as a salvage procedure.
后路减压手术(PDS)和前路减压手术(ADS)是治疗颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)的两种手术方式。每种手术都有其优缺点。颈椎椎板成形术作为PDS的一种类型,操作相对简单,可用于多节段脊髓受压的患者。ADS在技术上通常要求更高。
本研究旨在阐明PDS后需要进行ADS治疗的患者的临床特征和手术结果。
回顾性研究。
纳入144例颈椎椎板成形术后随访超过3年的患者。使用日本骨科协会(JOA评分)对神经功能状态进行分级。11例患者在PDS后接受了ADS。评估其临床背景和手术结果。比较PDS后需要进行ADS的11例患者(PA组)和133例不需要进行ADS的PDS患者(P组)的影像学表现。
在PA组中,颈椎椎板成形术后随访期间JOA评分略有下降。单侧上肢剧痛和颈椎脊髓病恶化是需要进行ADS的最典型症状。该组中混合型OPLL的发生率显著更高。所有患者在接受ADS作为二次手术后JOA评分均有所改善。
在我们治疗颈椎OPLL的手术策略中,椎板成形术的PDS仍然是初始治疗方法,对于随访期间出现神经功能恶化和新出现临床症状的患者,ADS被视为一种挽救性手术。