Mitchell Suzanne E, Gardiner Paula M, Sadikova Ekaterina, Martin Jessica M, Jack Brian W, Hibbard Judith H, Paasche-Orlow Michael K
Department of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA,
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb;29(2):349-55. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2647-2. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
Patient activation is linked to better health outcomes and lower rates of health service utilization. The role of patient activation in the rate of hospital readmission within 30 days of hospital discharge has not been examined.
A secondary analysis using data from the Project RED-LIT randomized controlled trial conducted at an urban safety net hospital. Data from 695 English-speaking general medical inpatient subjects were analyzed. We used an adapted, eight-item version of the validated Patient Activation Measure (PAM). Total scores were categorized, according to standardized methods, as one of four PAM levels of activation: Level 1 (lowest activation) through Level 4 (highest activation). The primary outcome measure was total 30-day post-discharge hospital utilization, defined as total emergency department (ED) visits plus hospital readmissions including observation stays. Poisson regression was used to control for confounding.
Of the 695 subjects, 67 (9.6 %) were PAM Level 1, 123 (17.7 %) were Level 2, 193 (27.8 %) were Level 3, and 312 (44.9 %) were Level 4. Compared with highly activated patients (PAM Level 4), a higher rate of 30-day post-discharge hospital utilization was observed for patients at lower levels of activation (PAM Level 1, incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.75, 95 % CI,1.18 to 2.60) and (PAM Level 2, IRR 1.50, 95 % CI 1.06 to 2.13). The rate of returning to the hospital among patients at PAM Level 3 was not statistically different than patients with PAM Level 4 (IRR 1.30, 95 % CI, 0.94 to 1.80). The rate ratio for PAM Level 1 was also higher compared with Level 4 for ED use alone (1.68(1.07 to 2.63)) and for hospital readmissions alone (1.93 [1.22 to 3.06]).
Hospitalized adult medical patients in an urban academic safety net hospital with lower levels of Patient Activation had a higher rate of post-discharge 30-day hospital utilization.
患者激活与更好的健康结果及更低的医疗服务利用率相关。患者激活在出院后30天内再入院率方面的作用尚未得到研究。
使用在一家城市安全网医院进行的RED-LIT项目随机对照试验的数据进行二次分析。对695名讲英语的普通内科住院患者的数据进行了分析。我们使用了经过验证的患者激活度量表(PAM)的一个改编的八项版本。根据标准化方法,总分被归类为四个PAM激活水平之一:1级(最低激活)至4级(最高激活)。主要结局指标是出院后30天的总住院利用率,定义为急诊室就诊总数加上再入院次数(包括观察性住院)。使用泊松回归来控制混杂因素。
在695名受试者中,67名(9.6%)为PAM 1级,123名(17.7%)为2级,193名(27.8%)为3级,312名(44.9%)为4级。与高激活患者(PAM 4级)相比,激活水平较低的患者(PAM 1级,发生率比[IRR] 1.75,95%置信区间,1.18至2.60)和(PAM 2级,IRR 1.50,95%置信区间1.06至2.13)出院后30天的住院利用率更高。PAM 3级患者的再入院率与PAM 4级患者相比无统计学差异(IRR 1.30,95%置信区间,0.94至1.80)。仅就急诊使用而言,PAM 1级与4级的率比也更高(1.68[1.07至2.63]),仅就再入院而言(1.93[1.22至3.06])。
在城市学术安全网医院中,患者激活水平较低的住院成年内科患者出院后30天的住院利用率较高。