Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
Br J Psychol. 2013 Nov;104(4):512-24. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12004. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
Vitalistic thinking has traditionally been associated with reasoning about biological phenomena. The current research aimed to investigate a broader range of vitalistic thinking than previously studied. Esoteric notions of 'energy' are frequently used by individuals when making causal attributions for strange occurrences, and previous literature has linked such thinking with paranormal, magical, and superstitious beliefs. Two experiments are described that aim to investigate whether adults are vitalistic when asked to make causal judgments, and whether this can be predicted by thinking styles and prior paranormal belief. Experiment 1 asked participants to rate three causal options (one of which was vitalistic) for six vignettes. Scores on one dimension of paranormal belief (New Age Philosophy) and analytical thinking significantly predicted vitalism, but scores on intuitive thinking and Traditional Paranormal Beliefs did not. Experiment 2 extended the findings by asking participants to generate their own causal responses. Again, paranormal belief was found to be the best predictor of vitalism, but this time Traditional Paranormal Beliefs were associated with vitalistic responses whilst both intuitive and analytical thinking were unable to significantly predict classification. Results challenge previous findings, suggesting that vitalistic thinking may operate differently when applied to everyday causal reasoning.
活力论思维传统上与对生物现象的推理有关。本研究旨在调查比以往研究更广泛的活力论思维。当个体对奇怪的事件进行因果归因时,常常会使用深奥的“能量”概念,先前的文献将这种思维与超自然、魔法和迷信信仰联系起来。本文描述了两项实验,旨在调查当被要求进行因果判断时,成年人是否具有活力论倾向,以及这种倾向是否可以通过思维方式和先前的超自然信仰来预测。实验 1 要求参与者对六个情景中的三个因果选项(其中一个是活力论的)进行评分。超自然信仰(新时代哲学)和分析思维的一个维度的得分显著预测了活力论,但直觉思维和传统超自然信仰的得分则没有。实验 2 通过要求参与者生成自己的因果反应扩展了发现。再次发现,超自然信仰是活力论的最佳预测因素,但这一次,传统超自然信仰与活力论反应有关,而直觉和分析思维都无法显著预测分类。研究结果挑战了先前的发现,表明当应用于日常因果推理时,活力论思维可能会以不同的方式运作。