• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据受助者的不同,存在对异性利他行为的性别二态偏好。

Sexually dimorphic preference for altruism in the opposite sex according to recipient.

机构信息

Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Br J Psychol. 2013 Nov;104(4):577-84. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12021. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1111/bjop.12021
PMID:24094285
Abstract

Sexual selection may affect human altruistic behaviour. Evolutionary psychology predicts that human mate preference reflects sexual selection. We investigated sex differences in preference for opposite-sex altruism according to recipient because the reasons for altruistic behaviour differ according to the relationship between actor and recipient. We employed the Self-Report Altruism Scale Distinguished by the Recipient, which was newly developed to evaluate altruism among Japanese undergraduates. We asked participants to evaluate preferences for each item based on the recipient of the altruistic behaviour (family members, friends or acquaintances, and strangers). Preference for opposite-sex altruism differed according to recipient, gender of the participant, and relationship type, and several significant interactions were observed among these factors. We suggest that whereas women use a potential partner's altruism towards strangers as a costly signal of their resource-holding potential when choosing a mate, they consider altruism towards family when they are in a long-term relationship to ensure that resources are not allocated to non-relatives.

摘要

性选择可能会影响人类的利他行为。进化心理学预测,人类的择偶偏好反映了性选择。我们根据接受者的不同,研究了异性对利他行为的偏好差异,因为利他行为的原因因行为者与接受者之间的关系而异。我们使用了新开发的《受助者区分的自我报告利他主义量表》来评估日本大学生中的利他主义。我们要求参与者根据利他行为的接受者(家庭成员、朋友或熟人以及陌生人)来评估对每个项目的偏好。异性利他行为的偏好因接受者、参与者的性别和关系类型而异,并且这些因素之间存在几个显著的相互作用。我们认为,女性在选择伴侣时,将潜在伴侣对陌生人的利他行为视为其资源持有潜力的昂贵信号,但当她们处于长期关系中时,她们会考虑对家人的利他行为,以确保资源不会分配给非亲属。

相似文献

1
Sexually dimorphic preference for altruism in the opposite sex according to recipient.根据受助者的不同,存在对异性利他行为的性别二态偏好。
Br J Psychol. 2013 Nov;104(4):577-84. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12021. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
2
Altruism as an indicator of good parenting quality in long-term relationships: further investigations using the Mate Preferences Towards Altruistic Traits Scale.作为长期关系中良好育儿质量的指标的利他主义:使用伴侣对利他特质量表进行的进一步研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jul-Aug;153(4):395-8. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2013.768595.
3
Do humans prefer altruistic mates? Testing a link between sexual selection and altruism towards non-relatives.人类更喜欢利他主义的配偶吗?检验性选择与对非亲属利他行为之间的联系。
Br J Psychol. 2008 Nov;99(Pt 4):555-72. doi: 10.1348/000712608X298467.
4
Chinese undergraduates' preferences for altruistic traits in mate selection and personal advertisement: Evidence from Q-sort technique.中国大学生在择偶和个人征婚中对利他特质的偏好:来自Q分类技术的证据。
Int J Psychol. 2017 Apr;52(2):145-153. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12207. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
5
[Self-Report Altruism Scale Distinguished by the Recipient (SRAS-DR): validity and reliability].[受助者区分的自我报告利他主义量表(SRAS-DR):效度与信度]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2013 Apr;84(1):28-36. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.84.28.
6
Provision or good genes? Menstrual cycle shifts in women's preferences for short-term and long-term mates' altruistic behavior.是资源提供还是优良基因?女性在月经周期中对短期和长期伴侣利他行为偏好的变化。
Evol Psychol. 2014 Oct 23;12(5):888-900. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200503.
7
A link between altruism and sexual selection: genetic influence on altruistic behaviour and mate preference towards it.利他主义与性选择之间的联系:对利他行为和对其配偶偏好的遗传影响。
Br J Psychol. 2010 Nov;101(Pt 4):809-19. doi: 10.1348/000712610X493494. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
8
A Research Note on the Influence of Relationship Length and Sex on Preferences for Altruistic and Cooperative Mates.关于恋爱时长和性别对利他及合作型伴侣偏好影响的研究笔记
Psychol Rep. 2019 Apr;122(2):550-557. doi: 10.1177/0033294118764640. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
9
Altruism predicts mating success in humans.利他主义预示着人类的交配成功率。
Br J Psychol. 2017 May;108(2):416-435. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12208. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
10
Selflessness is sexy: reported helping behaviour increases desirability of men and women as long-term sexual partners.无私是性感的:研究表明,乐于助人的行为会增加男性和女性作为长期性伴侣的吸引力。
BMC Evol Biol. 2013 Sep 3;13:182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-182.

引用本文的文献

1
How does dispositional mindfulness foster prosocial behavior? A cross-cultural study of empathy's mediating role and cultural moderation.气质性正念如何促进亲社会行为?共情的中介作用和文化调节的跨文化研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 20;15:1451138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451138. eCollection 2024.
2
Perceived teacher support, peer relationship, and university students' mental health: The mediation of reality and Internet altruistic behaviors.感知到的教师支持、同伴关系与大学生心理健康:现实利他行为和网络利他行为的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 29;13:999524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999524. eCollection 2022.
3
Genetic and Environmental Structure of Altruism Characterized by Recipients in Relation to Personality.
受助人的人格特质与利他主义的遗传和环境结构。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 8;57(6):593. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060593.
4
Shyness Weakens the Agreeableness-Prosociality Association via Social Self-Efficacy: A Moderated-Mediation Study of Chinese Undergraduates.害羞通过社交自我效能削弱宜人性与亲社会行为的关联:一项针对中国大学生的有调节的中介研究
Front Psychol. 2019 May 14;10:1084. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01084. eCollection 2019.
5
Decision-making in everyday moral conflict situations: Development and validation of a new measure.日常道德冲突情境下的决策:新测量工具的开发与验证。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 1;14(4):e0214747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214747. eCollection 2019.
6
In-Law and Mate Preferences in Chinese Society and the Role of Traditional Cultural Values.中国社会中的姻亲与配偶偏好及传统文化价值观的作用
Evol Psychol. 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):1474704917730518. doi: 10.1177/1474704917730518.
7
Provision or good genes? Menstrual cycle shifts in women's preferences for short-term and long-term mates' altruistic behavior.是资源提供还是优良基因?女性在月经周期中对短期和长期伴侣利他行为偏好的变化。
Evol Psychol. 2014 Oct 23;12(5):888-900. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200503.