Department of Anthropology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA,
Hum Nat. 2013 Dec;24(4):351-74. doi: 10.1007/s12110-013-9180-1.
Much existing literature in anthropology suggests that teaching is rare in non-Western societies, and that cultural transmission is mostly vertical (parent-to-offspring). However, applications of evolutionary theory to humans predict both teaching and non-vertical transmission of culturally learned skills, behaviors, and knowledge should be common cross-culturally. Here, we review this body of theory to derive predictions about when teaching and non-vertical transmission should be adaptive, and thus more likely to be observed empirically. Using three interviews conducted with rural Fijian populations, we find that parents are more likely to teach than are other kin types, high-skill and highly valued domains are more likely to be taught, and oblique transmission is associated with high-skill domains, which are learned later in life. Finally, we conclude that the apparent conflict between theory and empirical evidence is due to a mismatch of theoretical hypotheses and empirical claims across disciplines, and we reconcile theory with the existing literature in light of our results.
许多人类学领域的现有文献表明,在非西方社会中,教学是罕见的,文化传承主要是垂直的(父母到子女)。然而,人类进化理论的应用预测,无论是教学还是非垂直的文化学习技能、行为和知识的传播,都应该在跨文化中普遍存在。在这里,我们回顾这一理论体系,得出关于何时教学和非垂直传播应该是适应性的预测,因此更有可能在经验上观察到。通过对三个斐济农村社区的采访,我们发现父母比其他亲属类型更有可能进行教学,高技能和高价值的领域更有可能被教授,而间接传播则与高技能领域相关,这些领域是在以后的生活中学习的。最后,我们得出结论,理论与经验证据之间的明显冲突是由于不同学科的理论假设和经验主张不匹配造成的,并根据我们的结果使理论与现有文献相协调。