Suppr超能文献

募集股四头肌运动单位的顺序:股神经与直接股四头肌刺激。

Recruitment order of quadriceps motor units: femoral nerve vs. direct quadriceps stimulation.

机构信息

Department of Electrical and Electronical Engineering, Universidad Pública de Navarra D.I.E.E, Campus de Arrosadía s/n., 31006, Pamplona, Spain,

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 Dec;113(12):3069-77. doi: 10.1007/s00421-013-2736-2. Epub 2013 Oct 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To investigate potential differences in the recruitment order of motor units (MUs) in the quadriceps femoris when electrical stimulation is applied over the quadriceps belly versus the femoral nerve.

METHODS

M-waves and mechanical twitches were evoked using femoral nerve stimulation and direct quadriceps stimulation of gradually increasing intensity from 20 young, healthy subjects. Recruitment order was investigated by analysing the time-to-peak twitch and the time interval from the stimulus artefact to the M-wave positive peak (M-wave latency) for the vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles.

RESULTS

During femoral nerve stimulation, time-to-peak twitch and M-wave latency decreased consistently (P < 0.05) with increasing stimulus intensity, whereas, during graded direct quadriceps stimulation, time-to-peak twitch and VL M-wave latency did not show a clear trend (P > 0.05). For the VM muscle, M-wave latency decreased with increasing stimulation level for both femoral nerve and direct quadriceps stimulation, whereas, for the VL muscle, the variation of M-wave latency with stimulus intensity was different for the two stimulation geometries (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral nerve stimulation activated MUs according to the size principle, whereas the recruitment order during direct quadriceps stimulation was more complex, depending ultimately on the architecture of the peripheral nerve and its terminal branches below the stimulating electrodes for each muscle. For the VM, MUs were orderly recruited for both stimulation geometries, whereas, for the VL muscle, MUs were orderly recruited for femoral nerve stimulation, but followed no particular order for direct quadriceps stimulation.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在探讨在股四头肌腹和股神经上进行电刺激时,股四头肌内运动单位(MU)募集的潜在差异。

方法

本研究对 20 名年轻健康的受试者进行股神经刺激和直接股四头肌刺激,逐渐增加刺激强度,通过测量肌电图(M)波正峰至机械 twitch 峰值的时间(twitch 时程)和刺激伪迹至 M 波正峰的时间间隔(M 波潜伏期)来分析募集顺序。

结果

在股神经刺激时,twitch 时程和 M 波潜伏期随刺激强度的增加而持续降低(P<0.05),而在逐渐增加的直接股四头肌刺激时,twitch 时程和 VL M 波潜伏期没有明显的趋势(P>0.05)。对于 VM 肌肉,M 波潜伏期随刺激水平的增加而降低,无论是股神经刺激还是直接股四头肌刺激;而对于 VL 肌肉,M 波潜伏期随刺激强度的变化在两种刺激几何形状之间存在差异(P<0.05)。

结论

股神经刺激根据大小原则激活 MU,而直接股四头肌刺激时的募集顺序更为复杂,最终取决于外周神经及其在刺激电极下方的终末分支的结构。对于 VM 肌肉,两种刺激几何形状均能有序募集 MU,而对于 VL 肌肉,股神经刺激能有序募集 MU,但直接股四头肌刺激则没有特定的募集顺序。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验