• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

否认气候变化的书籍与保守派智库:探究两者之间的联系

Climate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks: Exploring the Connection.

作者信息

Dunlap Riley E, Jacques Peter J

机构信息

Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.

出版信息

Am Behav Sci. 2013 Jun;57(6):699-731. doi: 10.1177/0002764213477096.

DOI:10.1177/0002764213477096
PMID:24098056
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3787818/
Abstract

The conservative movement and especially its think tanks play a critical role in denying the reality and significance of anthropogenic global warming (AGW), especially by manufacturing uncertainty over climate science. Books denying AGW are a crucial means of attacking climate science and scientists, and we examine the links between conservative think tanks (CTTs) and 108 climate change denial books published through 2010. We find a strong link, albeit noticeably weaker for the growing number of self-published denial books. We also examine the national origins of the books and the academic backgrounds of their authors or editors, finding that with the help of American CTTs climate change denial has spread to several other nations and that an increasing portion of denial books are produced by individuals with no scientific training. It appears that at least 90% of denial books do not undergo peer review, allowing authors or editors to recycle scientifically unfounded claims that are then amplified by the conservative movement, media, and political elites.

摘要

保守主义运动,尤其是其智囊团,在否认人为全球变暖(AGW)的现实和重要性方面发挥了关键作用,特别是通过制造气候科学的不确定性来达到这一目的。否认AGW的书籍是攻击气候科学和科学家的重要手段,我们研究了保守派智囊团(CTTs)与截至2010年出版的108本气候变化否认书籍之间的联系。我们发现它们之间存在紧密联系,尽管对于越来越多的自费出版的否认书籍来说,这种联系明显较弱。我们还研究了这些书籍的国家来源以及其作者或编辑的学术背景,发现在美国CTTs的帮助下,气候变化否认论已蔓延到其他几个国家,而且越来越多的否认书籍是由没有科学训练的个人撰写的。似乎至少90%的否认书籍没有经过同行评审,这使得作者或编辑能够反复宣扬毫无科学依据的观点,而这些观点随后又被保守主义运动、媒体和政治精英进一步放大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ad/3787818/13451bbf8179/10.1177_0002764213477096-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ad/3787818/13451bbf8179/10.1177_0002764213477096-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ad/3787818/13451bbf8179/10.1177_0002764213477096-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Climate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks: Exploring the Connection.否认气候变化的书籍与保守派智库:探究两者之间的联系
Am Behav Sci. 2013 Jun;57(6):699-731. doi: 10.1177/0002764213477096.
2
Climate change contrarian think tanks in Europe: A network analysis.欧洲气候变化怀疑论智库:一项网络分析。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Apr;32(3):268-283. doi: 10.1177/09636625221137815. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
3
Internet Blogs, Polar Bears, and Climate-Change Denial by Proxy.网络博客、北极熊与代理气候变化否定论
Bioscience. 2018 Apr 1;68(4):281-287. doi: 10.1093/biosci/bix133. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
4
Computer-assisted classification of contrarian claims about climate change.计算机辅助的气候变化反面观点分类。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 16;11(1):22320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01714-4.
5
Influence and seepage: An evidence-resistant minority can affect public opinion and scientific belief formation.影响与渗透:有证据抵抗的少数派能够影响公众舆论和科学信念的形成。
Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:124-139. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
Climate denial in Canada and the United States.加拿大和美国的气候否认论。
Can Rev Sociol. 2022 Aug;59(3):369-394. doi: 10.1111/cars.12388. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
7
Examining the Effectiveness of Climate Change Frames in the Face of a Climate Change Denial Counter-Frame.审视气候变化框架在面对气候变化否定反框架时的有效性。
Top Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;8(1):76-97. doi: 10.1111/tops.12171. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
8
Counteracting climate denial: A systematic review.抵制气候怀疑论:一项系统综述。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 May;33(4):504-520. doi: 10.1177/09636625231223425. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
9
The Importance of Physician Climate Advocacy in the Face of Political Denial.面对政治上的否认,医生气候倡导的重要性。
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Dec 1;19(12):1222-1237. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.12.sect1-1712.
10
Think tanks and climate obstruction: Atlas affiliates in Canada.智库与气候阻碍:加拿大的阿特拉斯附属机构。
Can Rev Sociol. 2024 May;61(2):110-130. doi: 10.1111/cars.12467. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of construal level theory in identifying factors affecting individual decision-making in implementing flood protection measures in rural areas of Iran.解释水平理论在识别影响伊朗农村地区实施防洪措施中个体决策的因素方面的应用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 14;15(1):29873. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15847-3.
2
Is AI a functional equivalent to expertise in organizations and decision-making? Opportunities and pitfalls for AI in the context of just transitions.在组织与决策中,人工智能是否等同于专业知识?公正转型背景下人工智能的机遇与陷阱。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 May 23;8:1571698. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1571698. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Expert credibility in climate change.气候变化方面的专家可信度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 6;107(27):12107-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003187107. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
2
Defeating the merchants of doubt.击败怀疑论者。
Nature. 2010 Jun 10;465(7299):686-7. doi: 10.1038/465686a.
Is trust a zero-sum game? What happens when institutional sources get it wrong.
信任是一场零和博弈吗?当机构来源出现错误时会发生什么。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 22;20(4):e0321743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321743. eCollection 2025.
4
Globalizing opposition to pro-environmental institutions: The growth of counter climate change organizations around the world, 1990 to 2018.全球化对环保机构的反对:1990年至2018年全球反气候变化组织的发展
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0315012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315012. eCollection 2025.
5
Gender differences in climate change denial in Sweden: the role of threatened masculinity.瑞典气候变化否定态度中的性别差异:受威胁的男子气概所起的作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 11;15:1450230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1450230. eCollection 2024.
6
The climate : Minority discourses in readers' comments to climate change articles in the Portuguese press.气候:葡萄牙媒体关于气候变化文章的读者评论中的少数群体话语
Public Underst Sci. 2025 Jan;34(1):59-75. doi: 10.1177/09636625241254505. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
7
Do fossil fuel firms reframe online climate and sustainability communication? A data-driven analysis.化石燃料公司是否重新构建了在线气候与可持续发展沟通?一项数据驱动的分析。
NPJ Clim Action. 2023;2(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s44168-023-00086-x. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
8
Wicked problems in a post-truth political economy: a dilemma for knowledge translation.后真相政治经济中的棘手问题:知识转化的困境
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):280. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01789-6. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
9
The effect of social network sites usage in climate change awareness in Latin America.社交网站的使用对拉丁美洲气候变化意识的影响。
Popul Environ. 2023;45(2):7. doi: 10.1007/s11111-023-00417-4. Epub 2023 May 1.
10
The Relationship between Bullshit Receptivity and Willingness to Share Misinformation about Climate Change: The Moderating Role of Pregnancy.接受胡说八道的倾向与分享气候变化错误信息意愿之间的关系:怀孕的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 12;19(24):16670. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416670.