Suppr超能文献

远程医疗对全科医生诊疗量的影响:来自全系统示范集群随机试验的结果。

Impact of telehealth on general practice contacts: findings from the whole systems demonstrator cluster randomised trial.

机构信息

The Nuffield Trust, 59 New Cavendish Street, W1G 7LP London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 8;13:395. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-395.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Telehealth is increasingly used in the care of people with long term conditions. Whilst many studies look at the impacts of the technology on hospital use, few look at how it changes contacts with primary care professionals. The aim of this paper was to assess the impacts of home-based telehealth interventions on general practice contacts.

METHOD

Secondary analysis of data from a Department of Health funded cluster-randomised trial with 179 general practices in three areas of England randomly assigned to offer telehealth or usual care to eligible patients. Telehealth included remote exchange of vitals signs and symptoms data between patients and healthcare professionals as part of the continuing management of patients. Usual care reflected the range of services otherwise available in the sites, excluding telehealth. Anonymised data from GP systems were used to construct person level histories for control and intervention patients. We tested for differences in numbers of general practitioner and practice nurse contacts over twelve months and in the number of clinical readings recorded on general practice systems over twelve months.

RESULTS

3,230 people with diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure were recruited in 2008 and 2009. 1219 intervention and 1098 control cases were available for analysis. No statistically significant differences were detected in the numbers of general practitioner or practice nurse contacts between intervention and control groups during the trial, or in the numbers of clinical readings recorded on the general practice systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth did not appear associated with different levels of contact with general practitioners and practice nurses. We note that the way that telehealth impacts on primary care roles may be influenced by a number of other features in the health system. The challenge is to ensure that these systems lead to better integration of care than fragmentation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN43002091.

摘要

背景

远程医疗在慢性病患者的护理中越来越多地被使用。虽然许多研究着眼于技术对医院使用的影响,但很少有研究关注它如何改变与初级保健专业人员的接触。本文旨在评估基于家庭的远程医疗干预对一般实践接触的影响。

方法

对英国三个地区的 179 家普通实践进行的一项由卫生部资助的、以群组为基础的随机试验的数据进行二次分析,这些实践被随机分配提供远程医疗或常规护理给符合条件的患者。远程医疗包括患者和医疗保健专业人员之间远程交换生命体征和症状数据,作为患者持续管理的一部分。常规护理反映了在这些站点中其他可用的服务范围,不包括远程医疗。使用匿名的 GP 系统数据为对照和干预患者构建个人水平的病史。我们测试了在 12 个月内,普通医生和执业护士的就诊次数,以及在 12 个月内,一般实践系统上记录的临床读数的数量,在对照组和干预组之间是否存在差异。

结果

2008 年和 2009 年共招募了 3230 名患有糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病或心力衰竭的患者。共有 1219 例干预病例和 1098 例对照病例可供分析。在试验期间,干预组和对照组之间,普通医生和执业护士的就诊次数或一般实践系统上记录的临床读数数量均无统计学显著差异。

结论

远程医疗似乎与与普通医生和执业护士的接触程度没有不同。我们注意到,远程医疗对初级保健角色的影响方式可能受到卫生系统中许多其他特征的影响。挑战是确保这些系统导致更好的护理整合,而不是碎片化。

试验注册号

国际标准随机对照试验注册号注册中心 ISRCTN43002091。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/3852608/f90b145987bc/1472-6963-13-395-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验