Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Trauma Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2013 Oct;25(5):457-63. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12126. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
Describe the level of agreement between prehospital (emergency medical service [EMS]) and ED vital signs in a group of trauma patients transported to an inner city Major Trauma Centre. We also sought to determine factors associated with differences in recorded vital sign measurements.
All adult patients meeting trauma triage criteria and transported directly from scene of injury by New South Wales Ambulance to our institution were included. The primary outcome was the difference in vital signs: heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), respiratory rate (RR) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), between ED and EMS recorded measurements. Agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients and enhanced Bland-Altman plots. Multivariable linear regression models were used to determine factors associated with vital sign differences.
The 1181 trauma patients met inclusion criteria. Intraclass correlation coefficients were as follows: GCS 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37, 1.12); HR 0.41 (95% CI, 0.30, 0.53); SBP 0.37 (95% CI, 0.27, 0.46); and RR 0.29 (95% CI, 0.06, 0.51). Bland-Altman derived 95% limits of agreement lay outside a priori limits of clinical agreement for SBP and RR and were within limits of clinical agreement for GCS and HR. SBP and HR differences were associated with prehospital airway and fluid intervention.
Agreement was demonstrated between EMS and ED GCS scores but not RR and SBP recordings. Discrepancies appeared to reflect physiological changes in response to EMS initiated interventions. Trauma triage algorithms and risk models might need to take these measurement differences, and factors associated with them, into account.
描述一组送往市内大型创伤中心的创伤患者在院前(紧急医疗服务[EMS])和急诊科生命体征之间的一致性。我们还试图确定与记录的生命体征测量值差异相关的因素。
所有符合创伤分诊标准并由新南威尔士救护车直接从受伤现场送往我们机构的成年患者均被纳入研究。主要结局是急诊科和 EMS 记录的生命体征之间的差异:心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、呼吸频率(RR)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)。使用组内相关系数和增强的 Bland-Altman 图评估一致性。多变量线性回归模型用于确定与生命体征差异相关的因素。
共有 1181 名创伤患者符合纳入标准。组内相关系数如下:GCS 为 0.74(95%置信区间[CI],0.37,1.12);HR 为 0.41(95%CI,0.30,0.53);SBP 为 0.37(95%CI,0.27,0.46);RR 为 0.29(95%CI,0.06,0.51)。Bland-Altman 衍生的 95%一致性界限超出了 SBP 和 RR 的临床一致性预先设定的界限,而在 GCS 和 HR 的临床一致性界限内。SBP 和 HR 的差异与院前气道和液体干预有关。
在 EMS 和 ED GCS 评分之间显示出一致性,但 RR 和 SBP 记录则不一致。差异似乎反映了对 EMS 启动的干预措施的生理变化。创伤分诊算法和风险模型可能需要考虑这些测量差异及其相关因素。