Suppr超能文献

更长的院前时间会降低现场生命体征的可靠性:一项双中心研究。

Longer Prehospital Time Decreases Reliability of Vital Signs in the Field: A Dual Center Study.

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, 23336LAC USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, USA.

Division of Acute Care Surgery, School of Medicine, 53422West Virginia University, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2021 Jun;87(6):943-948. doi: 10.1177/0003134820956941. Epub 2020 Dec 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Field vital signs are integral in the American College of Surgeons (ASA) Committee on Trauma (COT) triage criteria for trauma team activation (TTA). Reliability of field vital signs in predicting first emergency department (ED) vital signs, however, may depend upon prehospital time. The study objective was to define the effect of prehospital time on correlation between field and first ED vital signs.

METHODS

All highest level TTAs at two Level I trauma centers (2008-2018) were screened. Exclusions were unrecorded prehospital vital signs and those dead on arrival. Demographics, prehospital time (scene time + transport time), injury data, and vital signs were collected. Differences between field and first ED vitals were determined using the paired Student's t test. Propensity score analysis, adjusting for age, sex, injury severity score (ISS), and mechanism of injury compared outcomes among patients with ISS ≥16. Multivariate linear regression determined impact of prehospital time on vital sign differences between field and ED among propensity-matched patients.

RESULTS

After exclusions, 21 499 patients remained. Mean prehospital time was 32 vs. 41 minutes ( < .001). On propensity score analysis, longer prehospital time was associated with significantly greater differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP) ( < .001), pulse pressure (PP) ( = .003), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ( < .001). On multivariate analysis, linear regression that demonstrated longer prehospital time was associated with greater differences in SBP, heart rate (HR), and PP ( < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Field vital signs are less likely to reflect initial ED vital signs when prehospital times are longer. Given the reliance of trauma triage criteria on prehospital vital signs, medical providers must be cognizant of this pitfall during the prehospital assessment of trauma patients.

摘要

背景

美国外科医师学会(AS)创伤委员会(COT)的创伤团队激活(TTA)分诊标准中,现场生命体征是不可或缺的。然而,现场生命体征预测首次急诊(ED)生命体征的可靠性可能取决于院前时间。本研究的目的是确定院前时间对现场与首次 ED 生命体征之间相关性的影响。

方法

筛选了两个一级创伤中心(2008-2018 年)所有最高级别的 TTA。排除标准为未记录的院前生命体征和到院前死亡。收集了人口统计学、院前时间(现场时间+转运时间)、损伤数据和生命体征。使用配对学生 t 检验确定现场和首次 ED 生命体征之间的差异。使用倾向评分分析,根据年龄、性别、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和损伤机制进行调整,比较 ISS≥16 的患者的结果。多元线性回归确定院前时间对倾向匹配患者的现场和 ED 生命体征差异的影响。

结果

排除后,仍有 21499 例患者。平均院前时间为 32 分钟对 41 分钟(<0.001)。在倾向评分分析中,较长的院前时间与收缩压(SBP)(<0.001)、脉压(PP)(=0.003)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)(<0.001)的差异显著更大。在多元分析中,线性回归显示较长的院前时间与 SBP、心率(HR)和 PP 的差异更大(<0.001)。

结论

当院前时间较长时,现场生命体征不太可能反映初始 ED 生命体征。鉴于创伤分诊标准对院前生命体征的依赖,医疗提供者在对创伤患者进行院前评估时必须意识到这一陷阱。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验