Division of Cancer Medicine, Gastroenterologic Surgery, Department of Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Takaramachi 13-1, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan,
World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):120-30. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2238-8.
The oncologic feasibility of video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has yet to be proven. We evaluated the oncologic outcome of VATS-esophagectomy by reviewing our 10-year experience, with particular emphasis on the effect of lymph node dissection.
From January 2003 to December 2012, 146 patients with esophageal cancer underwent completion of VATS-esophagectomy in the left lateral position.
The mean follow-up period was 37.1 months. Forty-six patients (31.5 %) had recurrence of cancer. Primary recurrence was hematogenous, lymphatic, peritoneal dissemination, pleural dissemination, locoregional, or port site in 20 (13.7 %), 23 (15.8 %), 2 (1.4 %), 5 (3.4 %), 4 (2.7 %), and 1 (0.67 %) patients, respectively. Pleural dissemination occurred more frequently after noncurative operation than curative operation (p = 0.010). The frequency of lymphatic metastasis within the mediastinal regional lymph nodes in the dissection field was only 5.5 %. The overall 5-year survival rate of stage I, II, and III disease after curative VATS-esophagectomy was 79.1, 77.9, and 56.7 %, respectively. T4 tumor, lymph node metastasis, R1 or 2, and concomitant lymph node metastasis in the cervical, mediastinal, and abdominal fields were indicators of unfavorable outcome. The lymph nodes in the abdominal region and those around the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) were frequent metastasis sites. Patients who had metastasis only around RLNs had favorable survival comparable to node-negative cases after curative VATS-esophagectomy.
Video-assisted thorascopic-esophagectomy has an excellent locoregional control effect with favorable oncologic outcome. The lymph node dissection procedure by VATS-esophagectomy has survival benefit for the patients having lymph node metastasis around bilateral RLNs.
胸腔镜(VATS)根治性食管癌切除术的肿瘤学可行性尚未得到证实。我们通过回顾我们的 10 年经验来评估 VATS 食管癌切除术的肿瘤学结果,特别强调淋巴结清扫的效果。
从 2003 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月,146 例食管癌患者在左侧卧位完成 VATS 食管癌切除术。
平均随访时间为 37.1 个月。46 例(31.5%)癌症复发。原发性复发是血行、淋巴、腹膜播散、胸膜播散、局部区域或端口部位的 20 例(13.7%)、23 例(15.8%)、2 例(1.4%)、5 例(3.4%)、4 例(2.7%)和 1 例(0.67%)。非根治性手术后胸膜播散较根治性手术后更常见(p = 0.010)。清扫区域内纵隔区域淋巴结的淋巴转移频率仅为 5.5%。根治性 VATS 食管癌切除术后 I、II 和 III 期疾病的 5 年总生存率分别为 79.1%、77.9%和 56.7%。T4 肿瘤、淋巴结转移、R1 或 2 以及颈、纵隔和腹部区域的同时淋巴结转移是不良预后的指标。腹部区域和双侧喉返神经(RLN)周围的淋巴结是常见的转移部位。仅 RLN 周围有转移的患者,在根治性 VATS 食管癌切除术后与淋巴结阴性病例相比,具有良好的生存获益。
胸腔镜辅助食管癌切除术具有良好的局部区域控制效果和良好的肿瘤学结果。VATS 食管癌切除术的淋巴结清扫程序对双侧 RLN 周围有淋巴结转移的患者具有生存获益。