• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
High-intensity emergency department visits increased in California, 2002-09.加利福尼亚州 2002-2009 年高强度急诊科就诊量增加。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Oct;32(10):1811-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0397.
2
Trends in Emergency Department Use by Rural and Urban Populations in the United States.美国农村和城市人口急诊就诊趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1919.
3
Trends in the use and capacity of California's emergency departments, 1990-1999.1990 - 1999年加利福尼亚州急诊科的使用情况及收治能力趋势
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Apr;39(4):389-96. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.122433.
4
Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997-2007.1997 - 2007年美国急诊科就诊的趋势与特征
JAMA. 2010 Aug 11;304(6):664-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1112.
5
Increasing critical care admissions from U.S. emergency departments, 2001-2009.2001-2009 年美国急诊部重症监护病房入院人数增加。
Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1197-204. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c086f.
6
Affordable Care Act and healthcare delivery: A comparison of California and Florida hospitals and emergency departments.《平价医疗法案》与医疗服务提供:加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州医院及急诊科的比较
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182346. eCollection 2017.
7
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2006年急诊科总结
Natl Health Stat Report. 2008 Aug 6(7):1-38.
8
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗调查:2005年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2007 Jun 29(386):1-32.
9
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1999 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:1999年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2001 Jun 25(320):1-34.
10
Patterns in Patient Encounters and Emergency Department Capacity in California, 2011-2021.2011-2021 年加利福尼亚州患者就诊和急诊科容量模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2319438. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.19438.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index in US Emergency Departments for the Rate of Mistriage.评估美国急诊部的紧急严重程度指数在分诊错误率方面的应用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233404. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3404.
2
Trends in High-Severity Billing of Hospitalized Medicare Beneficiaries Treated by Hospitalists vs Nonhospitalists.住院医师与非住院医师治疗的医疗保险受益人大额计费趋势。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Mar 18;3(3):e220120. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0120. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Trends in Costs of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries Treated in the Emergency Department From 2011 to 2016.2011 年至 2016 年,在急诊科接受治疗的 Medicare 受益人的护理费用趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e208229. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8229.
4
Trends in Visits to Acute Care Venues for Treatment of Low-Acuity Conditions in the United States From 2008 to 2015.2008 年至 2015 年美国因低 acuity 疾病至急性护理机构就诊的趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1342-1349. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3205.
5
Trends in the utilisation of emergency departments in California, 2005-2015: a retrospective analysis.2005 - 2015年加利福尼亚州急诊科的使用趋势:一项回顾性分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 23;8(7):e021392. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021392.
6
Are trends in billing for high-intensity emergency care explained by changes in services provided in the emergency department? An observational study among US Medicare beneficiaries.急诊科提供服务的变化能否解释高强度急诊护理计费的趋势?一项针对美国医疗保险受益人的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 30;8(1):e019357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019357.
7
A missed primary care appointment correlates with a subsequent emergency department visit among children with asthma.错过初级保健预约与哮喘患儿随后前往急诊科就诊相关。
J Asthma. 2017 Nov;54(9):977-982. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1283697. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
8
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in California Over 2000-2009: Implications for Emergency Medicine.2000 - 2009年加利福尼亚州的有创机械通气:对急诊医学的启示
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;16(5):696-706. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.6.25736. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
9
California emergency department visit rates for medical conditions increased while visit rates for injuries fell, 2005-11.2005年至2011年期间,加利福尼亚州因医疗状况前往急诊科就诊的比率上升,而因受伤前往就诊的比率下降。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Apr;34(4):621-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0471.

本文引用的文献

1
The Evolving Role of Emergency Departments in the United States.美国急诊科不断演变的角色。
Rand Health Q. 2013 Jun 1;3(2):3. eCollection 2013 Summer.
2
Increasing critical care admissions from U.S. emergency departments, 2001-2009.2001-2009 年美国急诊部重症监护病房入院人数增加。
Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1197-204. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c086f.
3
Computed tomography use among children presenting to emergency departments with abdominal pain.计算机断层扫描在因腹痛就诊于急诊科的儿童中的应用。
Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):e1069-75. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0739. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
4
California hospitals serving large minority populations were more likely than others to employ ambulance diversion.服务于大量少数族裔人群的加利福尼亚医院比其他医院更有可能采用救护车分流。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Aug;31(8):1767-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1020.
5
Dispelling myths about emergency department use: majority of Medicaid visits are for urgent or more serious symptoms.消除关于急诊科就诊的误解:大多数医疗补助计划就诊是因紧急或更严重的症状。
Res Brief. 2012 Jul(23):1-10, 1-3.
6
The growing role of emergency departments in hospital admissions.急诊科在医院住院治疗中日益重要的作用。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 2;367(5):391-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1204431. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
7
National trends in emergency department occupancy, 2001 to 2008: effect of inpatient admissions versus emergency department practice intensity.2001 年至 2008 年期间急诊科占用率的全国趋势:住院患者入院与急诊科就诊强度的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):679-686.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.05.014. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
8
The medicalization of chronic disease and costs.慢性病的医学化和成本。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2012 Apr;33:409-23. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124652. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
9
Emergency department crowding and risk of preventable medical errors.急诊科拥挤与可预防医疗失误风险。
Intern Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;7(2):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s11739-011-0702-8. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
10
Factors associated with closures of emergency departments in the United States.与美国急诊科关闭相关的因素。
JAMA. 2011 May 18;305(19):1978-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.620.

加利福尼亚州 2002-2009 年高强度急诊科就诊量增加。

High-intensity emergency department visits increased in California, 2002-09.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Oct;32(10):1811-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0397.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0397
PMID:24101073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4109394/
Abstract

Increasing use of the emergency department (ED) is well documented, but little is known about the type and severity of ED visits or their distribution across safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. We examined the rates of high-intensity ED visits--characterized by their use of advanced imaging, consultations with specialists, the evaluation of multiple systems, and highly complex medical decision making--by patients with a severe, potentially life-threatening illness in California from 2002 through 2009. Total annual ED visits increased by 25 percent, from 9.0 million to 11.3 million, but high-intensity ED visits nearly doubled, increasing 87 percent from 778,000 to 1.5 million per year. The percentage of ED visits with high-intensity care increased from 9 percent to 13 percent (a relative increase of 44 percent). Annual ED admissions increased by 39 percent overall; most of this increase was attributable to high-intensity ED admissions, which increased by 88 percent. Safety-net EDs experienced an increase in high-intensity visits of 157 percent, compared to an increase of 61 percent at non-safety-net EDs. These findings suggest a trend toward intensification of ED care, particularly at safety-net hospitals, whose patients may have limited access to care outside the ED.

摘要

越来越多的人使用急诊部(ED),这是有据可查的,但对于 ED 就诊的类型和严重程度,以及它们在安全网医院和非安全网医院的分布情况,知之甚少。我们研究了 2002 年至 2009 年期间,加利福尼亚州患有严重、可能危及生命的疾病的患者在急诊部接受高强度治疗的比率——其特点是使用先进的成像技术、与专家咨询、评估多个系统和高度复杂的医疗决策。ED 总就诊量增加了 25%,从 900 万增加到 1130 万,但高强度 ED 就诊量几乎翻了一番,从 77.8 万增加到每年 150 万。接受高强度治疗的 ED 就诊比例从 9%上升到 13%(相对增加了 44%)。ED 入院人数总体上增加了 39%;这一增长的大部分归因于高强度 ED 入院人数的增加,增长了 88%。与非安全网 ED 就诊量增长 61%相比,安全网 ED 就诊量增长了 157%。这些发现表明,ED 护理的强化趋势,特别是在安全网医院,这些医院的患者可能在 ED 之外获得医疗服务的机会有限。