Bagnato Gian Luca, Miceli Giovanni, Marino Natale, Sciortino Davide, Bagnato Gian Filippo
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Italy
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Italy.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Apr;55(4):755-62. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev426. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
OBJECTIVES: This trial aimed to test the effectiveness of a wearable pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) device in the management of pain in knee OA patients. METHODS: In this randomized [with equal randomization (1:1)], double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, patients with radiographic evidence of knee OA and persistent pain higher than 40 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) were recruited. The trial consisted of 12 h daily treatment for 1 month in 60 knee OA patients. The primary outcome measure was the reduction in pain intensity, assessed through VAS and WOMAC scores. Secondary outcomes included quality of life assessment through the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form version 2 (SF-36 v2), pressure pain threshold (PPT) and changes in intake of NSAIDs/analgesics. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included, and 60 completed the study. After 1 month, PEMF induced a significant reduction in VAS pain and WOMAC scores compared with placebo. Additionally, pain tolerance, as expressed by PPT changes, and physical health improved in PEMF-treated patients. A mean treatment effect of -0.73 (95% CI - 1.24 to - 0.19) was seen in VAS score, while the effect size was -0.34 (95% CI - 0.85 to 0.17) for WOMAC score. Twenty-six per cent of patients in the PEMF group stopped NSAID/analgesic therapy. No adverse events were detected. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that PEMF therapy is effective for pain management in knee OA patients and also affects pain threshold and physical functioning. Future larger studies, including head-to-head studies comparing PEMF therapy with standard pharmacological approaches in OA, are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01877278.
目的:本试验旨在测试一种可穿戴脉冲电磁场(PEMF)设备对膝骨关节炎(OA)患者疼痛管理的有效性。 方法:在这项随机(等随机化比例为1:1)、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验中,招募了具有膝OA影像学证据且视觉模拟量表(VAS)上持续疼痛高于40mm的患者。该试验对60名膝OA患者进行为期1个月、每天12小时的治疗。主要结局指标是通过VAS和WOMAC评分评估的疼痛强度降低情况。次要结局包括通过36项医学结局研究简表第2版(SF-36 v2)进行的生活质量评估、压力疼痛阈值(PPT)以及非甾体抗炎药/镇痛药摄入量的变化。 结果:纳入66名患者,60名完成研究。1个月后,与安慰剂相比,PEMF使VAS疼痛和WOMAC评分显著降低。此外,经PEMF治疗的患者,由PPT变化所表示的疼痛耐受性以及身体健康状况得到改善。VAS评分的平均治疗效果为-0.73(95%置信区间-1.24至-0.19),而WOMAC评分的效应大小为-0.34(95%置信区间-0.85至0.17)。PEMF组26%的患者停止了非甾体抗炎药/镇痛药治疗。未检测到不良事件。 结论:这些结果表明,PEMF疗法对膝OA患者的疼痛管理有效,并且还会影响疼痛阈值和身体功能。未来有必要开展更大规模的研究,包括将PEMF疗法与OA标准药物治疗方法进行对比的直接比较研究。 试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,http://www.clinicaltrials.gov,NCT01877278
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016-4
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005-7
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025-7-10
Research (Wash D C). 2025-5-22
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024-7-26
Mod Rheumatol. 2014-1
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012-4-13
Lancet. 2011-6-18